Annual Report 2009 - 2010
Contents
From the Chair and Director
About the New Zealand Teachers Council
Statement of Purpose
Our Functions
Governance
Strategic Focus: Effective Teachers
Outcomes Framework 2009/10
Achievements against the Statement of Intent
Performance Highlights
The Year at a Glance
Key Developments
Statement of Objectives and Service Performance
Output 1: Teacher Registration
Output 2: Professional Standards
Output 3: Professional Leadership
Output 4: Teacher Education
Reconciliation of Outputs to the Statement of Comprehensive Income
Assessing Organisational Health and Capability
People
Information Communications Technology
Financial Strategy
Financial Statements
Statement of Responsibility
Statement of Comprehensive Income
Statement of Movements in Equity
Statement of Financial Position
Statement of Cash Flows
Statement of Contingent Liabilities
Statement of Commitments
Significant Accounting Policies
Notes to the Financial Statements
Audit Report
Supporting Information
Disclosure of Fees2009/10
Directory
FROM THE CHAIR AND DIRECTOR
Teachers play a key role in promoting learning for children and young people in early childhood education settings and schools. Through setting and maintaining standards for entry to the profession, the New Zealand Teachers Council (the Council) continue to significantly influence the quality of the teaching profession.
Selection into an approved initial teacher education programme is the beginning of the journey. The second stage is reached when a student successfully graduates from an approved programme and is granted provisional registration. After undertaking a period of induction, the provisionally registered teacher is then able to take the third key step – being endorsed to move from provisional registration to full registration.
These key entry points have been the Council’s major focus over the last financial year. In particular, the following initiatives have been undertaken:
- Consultation on the development of revised requirements and processes for approving and monitoring initial teacher education programmes, including the implementation of the recently introduced standards for graduating teachers.
- The piloting and implementation of quality induction programmes for all provisionally registered teachers and training and support for mentor teachers.
- The implementation of revised standards and assurance processes for granting full registration for provisionally registered teachers and for the renewal of practising certificates.
The Council successfully piloted revised criteria for registering teachers as full members of the profession. It gazetted the Registered Teacher Criteria in December 2009 to replace the current Satisfactory Teacher Dimensions. It has begun a series of national workshops to familiarise professional leaders and teachers with these criteria, in preparation for their adoption from January 2011.
Beside setting requirements by which teachers can enter the profession, the Council also set conditions under which teachers are able to remain as members of the teaching profession. The Council receive complaints and mandatory reports relating to the behaviour and competence of teachers. There are clearly established rules and processes by which these reports and complaints are investigated and considered by the Council, its disciplinary bodies and competence assessors. It is also acknowledged that there are health issues that may arise which prevent teachers being able to fully meet their professional obligations. For this reason, the Impairment Committee was established in 2009 to assess and assist teachers with impairments.
The Council consulted with the profession about the need for a registration fee increase. The registration fee has not been increased since 2002 and quite simply, since 2002, the Council’s work has expanded and costs have gone up. The Council signalled the need for a review of the current fee as early as 2007. The new registration fee increase will take effect from 1 July 2010.
The past year has seen many of the Council projects come to fruition. We acknowledge the support and engagement of the profession in our various consultations, workshops and pilots. It is your voice and perspective that has shaped our professional leadership programmes, ensuring their future success. We acknowledge the hard work and expertise of the Council board members and staff in growing the organisation’s capability to meet the needs of teachers.
|
|
|
|
Alison McAlpine QSO JP New Zealand Teachers Council Chair 15 October 2010 |
Peter Lind New Zealand Teachers Council Director 15 October 2010 |
ABOUT THE NEW ZEALAND TEACHERS COUNCIL
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The New Zealand Teachers Council is an autonomous Crown Entity established under the Education Act 1989.
Its purpose as stated in the Act is:
...to provide professional leadership in teaching, enhance the professional status of teachers in schools and early childhood education, and contribute to a safe and high quality teaching and learning environment for children and other learners.”
OUR FUNCTIONS
- Setting the standards for entering the teaching profession and maintaining on-going membership.
- Setting the requirements for and approving initial teacher education programmes.
- Carrying out processes for efficient registration of teachers.
- Carrying out processes for investigating and dealing with issues of competence and conduct of teachers.
- Commissioning or carrying out research to support quality teaching and the other functions of the Council.
- Communicating with the profession to support teachers’ knowledge and understanding of the standards and commitments of the teaching profession, including the Code of Ethics for Registered Teachers.
- Consulting on key policy developments.
GOVERNANCE
| Alison McAlpine | Chair |
| Jenny Varney | Elected by Early Childhood Teachers |
| Ken Wilson | Elected by Primary School Teachers |
| Megan Cassidy | Elected by Secondary School Teachers |
| Pat Newman | Elected by Principals |
| Louise Green | New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) |
| Diane Wills | Post Primary Teachers' Association (PPTA) |
| Barbara Arnott | New Zealand School Trustees Association (NZSTA) |
| Kevin Knight | Ministerial Appointment |
| Lyn Brash | Ministerial Appointment |
| Makoha Gardiner | Ministerial Appointment |
During 2009/10 the Council farewelled its Chair Kathy Smith and welcomed new Chair Alison McAlpine. Alison has extensive experience as a secondary school teacher, principal, member of Secondary Principals Association of New Zealand Executive Committee, and has been involved with UNESCO and the United Nations. Alison is also a current member of the New Zealand Qualifications Authority Board.
The Council also welcomed new members Makoha Gardiner and Kevin Knight, both by ministerial appointment. Makoha Gardiner is an experienced kaiako, Head of Department Māori and Deputy Principal, with strong Māori language skills and expertise in conflict management and resolution. She has served over 12 years as Secretary for Te Arawa Pouako i te Reo and has been involved in Māori medium initiatives with both the Ministry of Education and New Zealand Qualifications Authority. Makoha was Chief Examiner for University Bursary Te Reo Rangatira 2000/03.
Kevin Knight is an experienced teacher and principal, and a founding director of the New Zealand Graduate School of Education. Kevin was also an educational psychologist before becoming a teacher educator, and has significant expertise in classroom behaviour management and teacher mentoring.
The Council has two standing committees: the Audit and Risk Management Committee, and the Professional Leadership Committee.
There are two advisory bodies to the Council: the Māori Medium Advisory Group, and the Early Childhood Education Advisory Group.
The Council also has various bodies to consider conduct and competence issues, including the Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC), Impairment Committee and Disciplinary Tribunal (DT).
STRATEGIC FOCUS: EFFECTIVE TEACHERS
For 2009/10 the Council continued to focus on key entry points into the profession, as levers to support and improve quality teaching. We have also worked on strengthening the standards for gaining, supporting and maintaining membership of the profession. Particular initiatives undertaken during the year are outlined on the following pages.
OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK 2009/10
| STRATEGIC OUTCOMES |
Government
Education Sector
New Zealand Teachers Council
| ||||
| COUNCIL OUTCOMES |
| ||||
| IMPACTS |
|
|
|
| |
| OUTPUT CLASSES | Teacher Registration
|
Professional Standards
|
Professional Leadership
|
Teacher Education
| |
| INPUTS | Provide professional leadership to and regulation of teachers through functions of:
Organisational Capability | ||||
ACHIEVEMENTS AGAINST THE STATEMENT OF INTENT
Several measures given in the Council's 2009/12 Statement of Intent will be achieved progressively over the three years. The milestones reached in the 2009/10 financial year are outlined below.
OUTCOME 1: ALL GRADUATES OF INITIAL TEACHER EDUCATION (ITE) PROGRAMMES ARE EFFECTIVELY PREPARED TO BEGIN TO TEACH
This year the Council focused on achieving consistently well-prepared graduates from all ITE programmes in the future, by way of strengthening the requirements for the approval and monitoring of ITE programmes. We also aimed to ensure that graduates in Māori medium settings are well-prepared to begin to teach, by developing an understanding of the level of reo proficiency they will require.
PERFORMANCE MILESTONES
Level of engagement during development of revised ITE requirements
- The Council developed new proposed requirements for the approval and monitoring of ITE programmes, and has achieved a good level of engagement with the sector during the consultation stage.
- Comprehensive consultation continues.
Level of consensus reached on what constitutes reo proficiency of graduates prepared to teach effectively in Māori medium settings
- Research, policies and initiatives of other agencies in the sector have been synthesised and a final report approved for publication.
OUTCOME 2: EFFECTIVE INDUCTION AND MENTORING PROGRAMMES SUPPORT PROVISIONALLY REGISTERED TEACHERS AS THEY MOVE TOWARD FULL REGISTRATION
High quality induction and mentoring support during the initial teaching years is critical to the successful ongoing development of newly-qualified teachers. The Council has initiated several pilots to trial the draft guidelines for induction and mentoring programmes. The guidelines will form the basis of a strong support framework for both provisionally registered teachers and their mentors.
PERFORMANCE MILESTONES
Evaluation of data from induction and mentoring pilot programmes
- One of the pilot programmes (in early childhood education) was completed with a final report submitted and the other three programmes continued into their second year.
- External evaluation across all the pilot programmes continued with Phase 3 of the evaluation plan investigating impact of the pilots on mentor teachers and on provisionally registered teachers.
OUTCOME 3: ALL CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE ARE EFFECTIVELY TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WHO MEET AND MAINTAIN THE STANDARDS AND PROFESSIONAL COMMITMENTS SET FOR THE PROFESSION
The Council's work towards high standards for the profession is a significant contribution to assuring learners, parents, employers and the public that teachers are equipped to be effective in their role. So that we provide assurance of teacher effectiveness from many perspectives, work in this area is contributed to by all Council business units, and is varied across several projects and processes.
PERFORMANCE MILESTONES
Identify trends on use of unregistered teachers/Limited Authority to Teach (LAT) to cover teaching positions
- Legislation in May 2010 enabling the Council-Ministry of Education data matching will assist us to identify those employed in a teaching position without a current practising certificate/authority to teach.
Evaluate impact of the Registered Teacher Criteria communications plan
- A national tour of workshops has begun. 873 registrations from professional leaders were received for the initial May-June 2010 workshops which continue until September 2010.
- Workshop resources were adjusted in response to evaluation feedback and prepared for publication on the Council's website.
Identify trends in enquiries received by the Council
- Enquiries are monitored and any issues or trends are identified and discussed.
Evaluate effectiveness of competence and disciplinary processes in terms of legislative compliance
- Evaluations of these processes are underway. An initial review of conduct and competence processes has been completed.
PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
THE YEAR AT A GLANCE
- Approved 12,699 new applications and re-applications for registration (2008/09: 12,387).
- Approved the renewal of 20,497 practising certificates for fully registered teachers (2008/09: 24,615).
- Finalised 5,067 teachers from provisional or subject to confirmation registration to full registration (2008/09: 4,499).
- Approved or re-approved 23 initial teacher education programmes (2008/09: 20).
- The CAC resolved 235 mandatory reports/complaints (2008/09: 186).
- The CAC referred 22 cases to the DT (2008/09: 15).
- Received 60 reports/complaints regarding teacher competence (2008/09: 27).
KEY DEVELOPMENTS
Registered Teacher Criteria
The new Registered Teacher Criteria were finalised, resources developed, and over 40 workshops held throughout New Zealand to assist professional leaders to implement the new criteria.
Induction and mentoring
During 2009/10, pilot programmes continued to trial various models for the induction and mentoring of provisionally registered teachers, and training and support for their mentor teachers.
Initial teacher education programme approval and monitoring requirements
Proposed new requirements for the approval and monitoring of initial teacher education programmes were developed and released for consultation with providers and the sector.
Impairment Committee
The Impairment Committee was established to assess and assist teachers with impairments. The Committee commenced on 22 September 2009 and by the end of the 2009/10 financial year is monitoring 13 teachers through this process.
Website refresh
The refresh of the Council’s website www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz was launched this year. This project, begun in 2008, has opened up significant opportunities going forward: we are now moving toward more dynamic, fluid and regular communications with teachers, the sector and the public.
Fee increase for triennial practising certificates
Confirmation of the practising certificate fee increase from $120 to $216 effective 1 July 2010 was communicated extensively over the last quarter, including an additional reminder to those eligible for the lower fee.
Data match project
The passing of the Education Amendment Act in May 2010 authorised an information matching programme between the Council and the Ministry of Education for those employed in a teaching position, and an initial data match took place.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND SERVICE PERFORMANCE
OUTPUT 1: TEACHER REGISTRATION
Maintain rigorous and efficient processing of registration applications
NOTES
- A secure electronic vet request system has been established with New Zealand Police, enabling greater interagency efficiency and more rapid turnaround on vet results in the second half of the year. This will also enable the further development of online registration.
- Timeliness for issue of practising certificates has stayed well above the standard that 80% of applications are approved within six weeks.
- From 1 July 2009 a late fee was introduced for those without a current practising certificate or authorisation to teach when they apply and who are employed in a teaching position. This has lead to a greater awareness of registration requirements. The late fee, together with the data match process, has helped to reduce the number of those unlawfully employed as professional leaders and teachers are now more diligent about complying.
- In the lead up to the 1 July 2010 fee increase, many teachers (dependent on eligibility) applied to renew their practising certificate early. This lead to an increase in applications received over what had been expected, particularly in June 2010.
HOW WE PERFORMED
| QUANTITY | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Estimated | 2008/09 Actual | |
Applications for registration
|
12,699 101 (0.8%) 746 (5.9%) |
13,480 Less than 1% Less than 5% |
12,387 97 972 |
Practising certificate renewal
|
20,497 314 (1.5%) 239 (1.2%) |
16,400 Less than 2% Less than 2% |
24,615 627 273 |
Provisional/Subject to Confirmation to Full
|
5,067 87 (1.7%) 395 (7.8%) |
4,702 Less than 3% Less than 5% |
4,499 143 402 |
LAT
|
1,097 .7%) 24 (20.4%) |
1,371 Less than 2% Less than 35% |
829 -* -* |
|
Applications are declined when they do not meet the Councils policy requirements (e.g. insufficient qualifications, recent teaching service, language proficiency and/or good character). Applications are closed if the applicant has failed to respond satisfactorily to more than four requests for information. | |||
| TIMELINESS | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | Standard | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Application for registration (6 weeks) | 91.66% | 80% | 94% |
| Practising certificate renewal (6 weeks) | 85.07% | 80% | 95% |
| Provisional/Subject to Confirmation to Full (4 weeks) | 99.37% | 80% | 99% |
| LAT (4 weeks) | 82.58% | 80% | -* |
| QUALITY | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | Standard | 2008/09 Actual | |
| All teacher quality assurance activities are made in accordance with the Education Act 1989 and the Council’s policies and procedures | Always | Always | Always |
| COST | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Budget | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Revenue | $2,223,201 | $1,935,823 | $1,993,347 |
| Expenditure | $1,707,066 | $1,805,672 | $1,759,655 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | $516,135 | $130,151 | $233,692 |
*New measure for 2009/10.
OUTPUT 2: PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
Maintain effective processes for considering conduct and competence of teachers
NOTES
- Number of complaints/mandatory reports received and resolved by the CAC has increased significantly since 2008/09. This is consistent with a rise in the number of teachers with current practising certificates (95,000+ in 2009/10 compared to 90,000+ in 2008/09), and is also likely to reflect awareness of and confidence in the Council's conduct and competence processes.
- Number of cases referred to the DT is steadily increasing.
- Total number of active files with the CAC as at 2009/10 financial year end is 114.
- Although the number of complaints increased in 2009/10 it is very small when compared to the total number of teachers registered with a current practising certificate.
HOW WE PERFORMED
| QUALITY | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | Standard | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Decisions are made in accordance with the requirements of the Education Act 1989 and the New Zealand Teachers Council Rules | Always | Always | Always |
| QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS* | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | Standard | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Complaints / mandatory reports received by CACs | 265 | 120 | 204 |
| Complaints / mandatory reports resolved by CACs | 235 | 120 | 186 |
| Cases referred by CAC to DT | 22 | 15 | 15 |
| Referrals from CAC to impairment process** | 20 | 15 | - |
| Referrals from Council to impairment process** | 2 | 15 | - |
| Cases determined by DT | 14 | 15 | 13 |
| Referrals from DT to impairment process** | 0 | 15 | - |
| Competency complaints / mandatory reports received | 60 | 50 | 27 |
| Competency cases being monitored within a 3 year period | 30 | 50 | -*** |
| Competency complaints / mandatory reports resolved | 22 | 50 | 28 |
| Referrals from CAC to competence | 6 | 15 | 12 |
| Conduct/competence cases resolved by the Council | 28 | 50 | 25 |
|
*Timeliness has been impacted by factors such as co-operation of other parties, extent of investigation required, and external processes (e.g. Police investigations, court hearings). **No Impairment Committee figures for 2008/09 as the Committee was established in 2009/10. ***New measure for 2009/10. | |||
| COST | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Budget | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Revenue | $1,056,576 | $1,007,797 | $990,107 |
| Expenditure | $1,446,761 | $1,443,262 | $1,380,304 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | ($390,185) | ($435,465) | ($390,197) |
OUTPUT 3: PROFESSIONAL LEADERSHIP
Provde effective policy advice and research to advance the strategic initiatives of the Council
NOTES
- Final Registered Teacher Criteria were approved, published and implementation began via a national workshop tour. In 2011 these standards will replace the Satisfactory Teacher Dimensions as the standards for gaining and maintaining full registration. Resources to support professional leaders to implement the Registered Teacher Criteria have been developed. The Registered Teacher Criteria handbook and poster have been published in English and Māori, distributed to schools/kura and early childhood education services, and posted to the Council's website.
- Consultation on an overarching registration policy was completed. The Council has now agreed on aspects of development that need to be progressed to shape the policy.
- Induction and mentoring pilot programme continues. Interim findings are analysed as they emerge.
- Generating comparative or baseline figures is not possible for this output class due to work being project based and varying each year.
HOW WE PERFORMED
| QUALITY | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | Standard | ||
| Policy and research comply with Council guidelines | Always | Always | |
| Policy and research projects are delivered to the agreed quality, deadlines and budget | Always* | Always | |
|
*Projects have met milestone deadlines except where the Council have deferred target dates or where contractors have been asked for further information to meet milestone requirements. | |||
| QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Estimated | ||
Consult with the profession to develop an overarching registration policy
|
Completed Completed |
Complete by October 2009 Complete by February 2010 | |
Finalise and phase-in implementation of Registered Teacher Criteria
|
Final criteria approved and published National workshops underway |
Complete by December 2009 Evaluate effectiveness and strategy | |
Monitor and evaluate induction and mentoring pilots
|
Milestones met Interim findings analysed Continuing |
Milestone dates as per contracts Discussion paper by July 2010 | |
Investigate the reo proficiency required of graduates of Māori medium ITE programmes
|
Final report approved for publication Continuing due to delay in final report completion |
Literature review by October 2009
By March 2010
| |
Review of the Governance arrangements and functions of the Council
|
Deferred to 2010/11 |
By July 2010
| |
| COST | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Budget | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Revenue | $1,090,536 | $1,017,645 | $1,275,425 |
| Expenditure | $2,399,354 | $2,734,485 | $2,519,864 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | ($1,308,818) | ($1,716,840) | ($1,244,439) |
OUTPUT 4: TEACHER EDUCATION
Maintain effective processes for evaluation, approvals and monitoring of ITE programmes.
NOTES
- Proposed new requirements for the approval and monitoring of ITE programmes are being developed.
- Timeframes for completion of the new requirements were extended to enable wider consultation with programme providers and the wider education sector.
- 23 ITE programmes were approved/re-approved in 2009/10.
HOW WE PERFORMED
| QUALITY | ||||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Estimated | 2008/09 Actual | ||
| All decisions are consistent with the Council standards and guidelines for approvals of ITE programmes and relevant legislation
|
Always | Always | Always | |
| QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS | ||||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Estimated | |||
Development of new approval and monitoring system for ITE programmes
|
Extended Extended Extended |
Complete by February 2010 Complete by February 2010 Complete by July 2010 | ||
| Approval of new ITE programmes 2009/10 | ||||
| Universities | Institutes / Polytechnics | Wananga | PTEs | |
| Early childhood | - | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Primary | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
| Secondary | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Re-approval of existing ITE programmes 2009/10 | ||||
| Universities | Institutes / Polytechnics | Wananga | PTEs | |
| Early childhood | 5 | - | - | 2 |
| Primary | 3 | - | 1 | 1 |
| Secondary | 1 | - | - | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| 2009/10 Actual | 2008/09 Actual | |||
| Total programmes considered for approval/ re-approval across all providers |
23 | 20 | ||
| COST | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Budget | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Revenue | $481,665 | $433,518 | $424,085 |
| Expenditure | $357,813 | $401,111 | $299,818 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | $123,852 | $32,407 | $124,267 |
RECONCILIATION OF OUTPUTS TO THE STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| NON-TEACHER POLICE VETTING* | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Budget | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Revenue | $141,125 | $84,455 | $180,070 |
| Expenditure | $136,663 | $86,709 | $151,031 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | $4,462 | ($2,254) | $29,039 |
| RECONCILIATION | |||
| 2009/10 Actual | 2009/10 Budget | 2008/09 Actual | |
| Teacher Registration | $516,135 | $130,151 | $233,692 |
| Professional Standards | ($390,185) | ($435,465) | ($390,197) |
| Professional Leadership | ($1,308,818) | ($1,716,840) | ($1,244,439) |
| Teacher Education | $123,852 | $32,407 | $124,267 |
| Net Surplus/(Deficit) Outputs | ($1,059,016) | ($1,989,747) | ($1,276,677) |
| Non-Teacher Police Vetting* | $4,462 | ($2,255) | $29,039 |
| Net Surplus/(Deficit) | ($1,054,554) | ($1,992,002) | ($1,247,638) |
| *Due to the passing of the Education Amendment Act 2010 and effective 21 May 2010, the Council is no longer responsible for Non-Teacher Police Vetting. | |||
Note: The 2009/10 Budget figures shown here are true and correct. Variation from the budget figures given in the Council's 2009/12 Statement of Intent are due to a printing error during publication.
ASSESSING ORGANISATIONAL HEALTH AND CAPABILITY
PEOPLE
| STAFF TURNOVER | ||
| 2009/10 | 2008/09 | |
| Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff Resignations | 40.4 11 | 42.37 7 |
| PROPORTION | 27.23% | 16.52% |
GOOD EMPLOYER
The Council recognises that equality and diversity are key ingredients for organisational success. We are committed to integrating equality and diversity into all aspects of our work, as this will enable us to improve our services and to retain and attract talented staff.
The Council's 2009/12 Statement of Intent identified that the achievement of several measures would enable the evaluation of its performance as a good employer.
Implement a formal Equal Employment Opportunities programme driven by organisational values
- Findings from the Pay and Employment Equity study showed an overall staff perception that the Council currently provides Equal Employment Opportunities.
Ensure procedural fairness is maintained for all human resources strategies, systems and practices during 2009/10
- Procedural fairness has been maintained.
Employment of Māori and Pasifika staff is encouraged at all levels of the organisation
- Two Māori/Pasifika FTE staff employed this year (total FTE staff employed this year: eight).
INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY
Several significant developments to Information Communications Technology (ICT) have occurred this year, enabling significant improvements to our processes and progress on current projects.
Infrastructure enabling the Council to match its records to the Ministry of Education was completed, and the first data match took place following legislative authorisation in May 2010. This initial match found a small percentage of unmatched records. The small percentage of records in question (remembering that 95,000+ teachers hold a current practising certificate) is likely due to efforts to improve data quality, and promote awareness of the importance of the registration process.
An electronic transfer system between the Council and New Zealand Police was launched this year. This allows significant improvements in the turnaround times for processing applications for practising certificates and enables further ICT opportunities.
The Council's website was refreshed and the updated site launched in May 2010. This concluded a considerable project to improve the accessibility, relevance and overall look-and-feel of the website.
FINANCIAL STRATEGY
Reviewed, consulted on, and had new practising certificate fee approved by the Minister, for implementation in July 2010.
Despite a deficit in the 2009/10 financial year, the Council maintain a satisfactory level of working capital.
The Council continue to maintain a sound financial position through monitoring our financial performance on a monthly basis and conducting quarterly re-forecasts. This enables more transparency and accountability in our business functions.
We contract the accounting firm Grant Thornton to conduct monthly reviews of the management accounts to ensure the continuing high quality presentation of financial information to the entity and stakeholders.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
We accept responsibility for the preparation of the following statements of account and the judgments used therein. The financial statements have been prepared on the basis of generally accepted accounting practice and in accordance with the Crown Entities Act 2004.
We acknowledge the establishment and maintenance of internal control procedures and these are considered to be sufficient to provide a reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial and non-financial reporting.
In our opinion, the financial statements for the twelve months ended 30 June 2010 fairly reflect the financial position, the results of operations, the cash flows and service performance of the Council.
|
|
|
|
Alison McAlpine QSO JP New Zealand Teachers Council Chair 15 October 2010 |
Barbara Arnott New Zealand Teachers Council Chair (Audit & Risk Management Committee) 15 October 2010 |
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 | ||||
| Note | 2009/10 Actual $ | 2009/10 Budget $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | |
Income
|
1 |
4,718,724 39,543 242,021 5,000,288 |
4,264,582 4,500 210,156 4,479,238 |
4,359,346 18,145 486,469 4,863,960 |
Expenses
|
3 4, 5 2
|
2,720,103 169,167 2,124,482 5,013,752 |
2,743,814 201,528 2,277,140 5,222,482 |
2,508,323 224,153 2,101,132 4,833,608 |
| Core operating surplus/(deficit) | (13,464) | (743,244) | 30,352 | |
| Special projects | 1,041,090 | 1,248,758 | 1,028,837 | |
| Council elections | - | - | 249,153 | |
| Net surplus deficit | (1,054,554) | (1,992,002) | (1,247,638) | |
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | |
| TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR | (1,054,554) | (1,992,002) | (1,247,638) | |
|
Accompanying accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements. | ||||
STATEMENT OF MOVEMENTS IN EQUITY
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 | ||||
| Note | 2009/10 Actual $ | 2009/10 Budget $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | |
| Public equity as at 1 July 2009 | 4,040,657 | 3,880,596 | 5,288,295 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | (1,054,554) | (1,992,002) | (1,247,638) | |
| Public equity as at 30 June 2010 | 2,986,103 | 1,888,594 | 4,040,657 | |
|
Accompanying accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements. | ||||
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 | ||||
| Note | 2009/10 Actual $ | 2009/10 Budget $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | |
Public equity
|
2,986,103 2,986,103 |
1,888,594 1,888,594 |
4,040,657 4,040,657 | |
| Represented by: | ||||
Assets Current assets
Total assets |
9 7 8 4 5 |
2,874,262 125,697 3,110,245 6,110,204 207,453 126,081 |
2,197,479 75,000 1,788,427 4,060,906 251,103 180,968 |
3,984,450 194,012 2,709,577 6,888,039 243,569 154,864 |
Liabilities Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Total liabilities |
6 12 11 |
5,025 2,435,071 157,221 2,597,317 860,318 860,318 3,457,635 |
21,626 1,174,627 82,500 1,278,753 1,325,629 1,325,629 2,604,382 |
20,100 2,125,258 142,458 2,287,816 957,999 957,999 3,245,815 |
| NET ASSETS | 2,986,103 | 1,888,594 | 4,040,657 | |
| Working capital Working capital ratio |
3,512,887 2.35 |
2,782,153 3.18 |
4,600,223 3.01 | |
|
Accompanying accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements. | ||||
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 | ||||
| Note | 2009/10 Actual $ | 2009/10 Budget $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | |
| Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash provided from
Cash applied to
NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
10 |
4,741,870 39,543 329,724 (3,066,244) (2,705,340) 55,194 (5,716,390) (605,253) |
3,893,235 4,500 210,156 (1,364,318) (2,743,814) - (4,108,132) (241) |
4,829,951 12,697 536,708 (3,434,501) (2,584,257) (15,100) (6,033,858) (654,502) |
| Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash provided from
Cash applied to
NET CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
- 3,584,925 3,584,925 (46,734) (57,535) (2,474,735) (2,579,004) 1,005,921 |
- - - (75,500) (85,000) (353,823) (514,323) (514,323) |
- 802,042 802,042 (90,813) (138,245) (708,905) (937,963) (135,921) | |
| Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents | 400,668 | (514,564) | (790,423) | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of year | 8 | 2,709,577 | 2,302,990 | 3,500,000 |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of year | 8 | 3,110,245 | 1,788,427 | 2,709,577 |
|
Operating activities include all transactions and other events that are not investing or financing activities. Investing activities are those activities relating to the acquisition, holding and disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment and of investments. Investments can include securities not falling within the definition of cash. Financing activities are those activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the capital structure. This includes both equity and debt not falling within the definition of cash. | ||||
|
Accompanying accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements. | ||||
STATEMENT OF CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
| Legal proceedings against New Zealand Teachers Council | 10,000 | 20,000 | |
| Personal grievances | - | - | |
|
The New Zealand Teachers Council has identified above those contingent liabilities which it assesses may give rise to liabilities against the Council in the future. The Council is not aware of any personal grievances either impending or underway against the Council as at 30 June 2010 (2009: Nil). The legal proceedings against the Council are those cases that are currently in the Complaints/Disciplinary process as at 30 June 2010. The Council has had one case referred to the District and/or High Court in 2009/10. This is estimated to have legal costs of $10,000. (As at 30 June 2009, there were four cases). | |||
STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
Non-cancellable commitments – operating lease commitments
|
149,621 9,713 - - |
332,313 149,621 9,713 - | |
|
The non-cancellable operating lease relates to the lease of three and a half floors of an office building. The lease on three floors was renegotiated in November 2007 and the lease for the remaining half floor was renegotiated in August 2008. The lease is due to expire on 31 October 2010 for levels 6, 7 and 9 and on 27 August 2011 for the level 8 half floor. The Council does not have the option to purchase the asset at the end of the lease term. There are no restrictions placed on the Council by its leasing arrangements. | |||
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
REPORTING ENTITY
The Council is an autonomous Crown Entity as defined by the Crown Entities Act 2004 and is domiciled in New Zealand.
The Council’s primary objective is to provide public services, as opposed to making a financial return.
Accordingly, the Council has designated itself as a public benefit entity for the purposes of New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZIFRS).
The financial statements of the Council are for the year ended 30 June 2010, and were approved by the Council on 15 October 2010.
BASIS OF PREPARATION
The financial statements of the Council have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Crown Entities Act 2004, which includes the requirement to comply with New Zealand generally accepted accounting practice (NZGAAP).
The Council's financial statements comply with NZIFRS and other applicable Financial Reporting Standards, as appropriate for public benefit entities.
The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements.
MEASUREMENT BASE
The measurement base adopted is historical cost, except where modified by the measurement of equity investments and derivative financial instruments at fair value.
Currency is in New Zealand dollars ($NZD).
CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no changes in accounting policies. All policies used for the preparation of the financial statements have been applied on a basis consistent with previous years other than those resulting from the transition to NZIFRS.
JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATIONS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity to NZIFRS requires judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. Where material, information on the major assumptions is provided in the relevant accounting policy or in the relevant note.
The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Subsequent actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis.
Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised when the revision affects only that period. If the revision affects both current and future periods, it is reflected in the respective period to which it relates.
DIFFERENTIAL REPORTING
The Council qualifies for differential reporting under the NZIFRS Differential Reporting Framework (3.8) with the size criteria exemption (3.9) as total gross income is less than $20 million and total assets are less than $10 million.
The Council has applied the following differential reporting exemptions:
NZ IAS 1 - Presentation of financial statements
- Note disclosure on accounting and assumptions.
- Note disclosure on the Council’s capital management policy.
NZ IAS 17 – Leases
- Note disclosure of future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases.
NZ IAS 24 – Related party disclosure
- Note disclosure of key management personnel compensation.
NZ IFRS 7 – Financial instruments disclosure
- Information that enables the users to evaluate the nature and extent or risk arising from financial instruments.
- Detail or risk arising from credit, liquidity and market risk and how this risk is managed.
- Qualitative disclosure of risk arising from financial instruments.
- Quantitative disclosure of risk arising from financial instruments.
- Details of maximum exposure to credit risk.
- Analysis of the age of financial assets that are past due.
- Maturity analysis of financial liabilities.
- Sensitivity analysis of market risk and other price risk.
BUDGET FIGURES
The budget figures are those approved by the Council at the beginning of the financial year. The budget figures have been prepared in accordance with NZ GAAP and are consistent with the accounting policies adopted by the Council for the preparation of the financial statements. They comply with NZIFRS and other applicable Financial Reporting Standards as appropriate for public benefit entities.
REVENUE
The Council derives revenue from the following:
- Registration and practising certificate fees
- Limited Authority to Teach fees
- Overseas fees
- Late fees
- Teacher education programme approval income
- Other revenue
Interest income is recognised using the effective interest method.
All other revenue is recognised when earned and is reported in the financial period to which it relates.
GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (GST)
All items in the financial statements are presented exclusive of GST, except for receivables and payables, which are presented on a GST inclusive basis. Where GST is not recoverable as an input tax then it is recognised as part of the related asset or expense.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) is included as part of the receivables or payables in the Statement of Financial Position.
The net GST paid to, or received from the IRD, including the GST relating to investing and financing activities, is classified as an operating cash flow in the statement of cash flows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed exclusive of GST.
INCOME TAX
The Council is a public authority in terms of the Income Tax Act 2004 and consequently is exempt from income tax.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are measured at their carrying value which approximates their fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any provision for impairment.
Bad debts are written off during the period in which they are identified.
CREDITORS AND OTHER PAYABLES
Creditors and other payables are initially measured at their carrying values, which approximate their fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise deposits with banks together with bank and cash balances, net of bank overdrafts. Term deposits with terms of 93 days or less are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
TERM DEPOSITS
Investment in term deposits are initially measured at their carrying value which approximates their fair value plus transaction costs if any.
After initial recognition the term deposits are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
For all term deposits, the Council considers whether, at each balance date, there is objective evidence that the Council will not be able to collect amounts due according to the original terms of the deposit. There were no impaired term deposits in the 2009/10 financial year.
RECOGNITION OF COST, ADDITIONS, DISPOSALS AND DEPRECIATION
Items of Property, Plant and Equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
Depreciation is charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Income using the straight-line method. Depreciation is set at rates that will write off the cost or fair value of the assets, less their estimated residual values, over their useful lives. The estimated useful life and resulting rates are as follows:
|
Class of Asset |
Estimated Life | Depreciation Rate |
| Office Equipment Computer Equipment Furniture and Fittings Office Fit-out |
5 years 3 years 15 years 5 years |
20% 33.3% 6.7% 20% |
The residual value of assets is reassessed annually.
The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised as an asset only when it is probable that future economic benefits or service potential associated with the item will flow to the Council and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Where an asset is acquired at no cost, or obtained for a nominal cost, it is recognised at fair value when control over the asset is obtained.
Where an item of plant and equipment is disposed of, the gain or loss recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income is calculated as the difference between the net sale price and the carrying amount of the asset.
Costs incurred subsequent to initial acquisition are capitalised only when it is probable that future economic benefits or service potential associated with the item will flow to the Council and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The costs of day-to-day servicing of property, plant and equipment are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as they are incurred.
RECOGNITION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND AMORTISATION
These are comprised of software acquisition and development including upgrades of existing software.
Amortisation is charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Income on a straight-line basis over the useful life. The estimated useful life is as follows:
| Estimated Life | Amortisation Rate | |
| Acquired Software Developed Software | 3 years 3 years | 33% 33% |
The intangible assets above are deemed to have finite lives.
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and to bring to use the specific software. Costs that are directly associated with the development of software for internal use by the Council, are recognised as an intangible asset. Direct costs include the software development, employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads.
Staff training costs are recognised as an expense when incurred. Costs associated with maintaining computer software are recognised as an expense when incurred. Costs associated with the development and maintenance of the Council's website are recognised as an expense when incurred.
IMPAIRMENT OF NON-FINANCIAL ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets that have a finite useful life are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the assets carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an assets fair value less costs to sell and value in use.
If an asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is impaired and the carrying amount is written down to the recoverable amount.
The total impairment loss, or reversal of an impairment loss, is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.
EMPLOYEE ENTITLEMENTS
Short-term employee entitlements:
- Salaries and wages accrued up to balance date
- Annual leave earned, but not yet taken at balance date
- Sick leave.
The Council does not have bonus schemes or long service leave available to staff.
SUPERANNUATION SCHEMES
Obligations for contributions to KiwiSaver and the Government Superannuation Fund are recognised as an expense in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as incurred.
OPERATING LEASES
Operating lease payments, such as rent, where the lessors effectively retain substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the leased items, are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Operating lease expenses are recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Council uses financial instruments as part of its normal operations. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, debtors, term deposits, and creditors. All financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Financial Position and all revenues and expenses in relation to financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. All financial instruments are recognised and stated at fair value.
COST ALLOCATION
The Council has four output classes outlined in the Statement of Intent. These are Teacher Registration, Maintenance of Professional Standards, Professional Leadership and Teacher Education. The Council has derived the cost of each output using the system outlined below:
- Direct costs are directly attributable to an output and are charged directly to the outputs.
- Indirect costs are those that cannot be identified in an economically feasible manner with a specific output. Charges to outputs are based on appropriate cost drivers such as actual usage, staff numbers and floor area.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| NOTE 1: REVENUE | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2009/10 Budget $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | |
| Fees | 3,624,094 | 3,373,288 | 3,538,099 |
| Limited Authority to Teach | 56,219 | 67,050 | 46,636 |
| Non-Teacher Police Vetting | 141,031 | 84,455 | 179,880 |
| Provisional/Subject to Confirmation to Full | 388,083 | 334,345 | 345,417 |
| Crown | 178,000 | 178,000 | 178,000 |
| Teacher education approvals | 68,501 | 42,000 | 46,619 |
| Discipline recovered | 4,484 | 5,000 | 24,694 |
| Overseas teacher fees | 97,705 | 113,778 | - |
| Late fees | 160,606 | 66,667 | - |
| TOTAL | 4,718,724 | 4,264,582 | 4,359,346 |
| NOTE 2: OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2009/10 Budget $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | |
| Administrative | 1,234,804 | 1,259,012 | 1,232,409 |
Audit fees to Auditors
|
37,780 2,080 |
55,000 - |
36,580 - |
| Professional/Consultancy fees | 68,559 | 32,400 | 45,034 |
| Advisory committees | 20,237 | 39,861 | 38,337 |
| Council member fees | 180,163 | 212,573 | 164,757 |
| Complaints/discipline | 260,277 | 361,055 | 269,219 |
| Rent | 317,239 | 317,239 | 314,610 |
| Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment | - | - | 186 |
| Doubtful debts | 3,343 | - | - |
| TOTAL | 2,124,482 | 2,277,140 | 2,101,132 |
| NOTE 3: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT COSTS | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2009/10 Budget $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | |
| Wages and salaries | 2,531,516 | 2,585,633 | 2,338,613 |
| Staff professional development | 18,061 | 64,641 | 55,826 |
| Superannuation | 45,626 | 39,923 | 30,494 |
| Kiwisaver employer contribution | 23,242 | 26,238 | 5,461 |
| Temporary staff | 85,043 | 10,320 | 61,049 |
| ACC levies | 12,148 | 11,050 | 11,430 |
| Payroll fees | 4,468 | 6,010 | 5,449 |
| TOTAL | 2,720,103 | 2,743,814 | 2,508,323 |
|
NOTE 4: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | ||||||
| Computer Equipment $ | Office Equipment $ |
Office Fit-out $ |
Fixtures and Fittings $ | Work in Progress $ |
TOTAL
$ | |
| Balance at 30 June 2010 Cost Accumulated Depreciation and Impairment Carrying Value |
207,349 176,094 |
133,625 88,581 |
284,504 249,036 |
163,291 67,605 |
- - - |
788,769 581,316 |
| Balance at 30 June 2009 Cost Accumulated Depreciation and Impairment Carrying Value |
268,479 237,177 31,302 |
141,928 101,387 40,541 |
284,504 213,760 70,744 |
157,816 56,834 100,982 |
- - - |
852,727 609,158 243,569 |
| NOTE 5: INTANGIBLE ASSETS | |
| Acquired Software $ | |
| Balance at 30 June 2010 Cost Amortisation and Impairment Losses Carrying Amount |
645,692 519,611 126,081 |
| Balance at 30 June 2009 Cost Amortisation and Impairment Losses Carrying Amount |
588,157 433,293 154,864 |
|
Intangibles are reviewed for impairment annually. There have been no indications of impairment in 2010 (2009: nil). The intangible assets have a useful life of three years. | |
| NOTE 6: DEFERRED LEASE LIABILITY |
| This liability reflects the building owner contribution and rent holiday provided to the Council upon taking the lease for its premises at 93 The Terrace, Wellington. These contributions will be fully amortised by October 2010. |
| NOTE 7: TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
| Trade Receivables | 64,967 | 48,329 | |
| Less: Provision for Doubtful Debts | (3,343) | - | |
| Accrued Interest | 37,416 | 125,119 | |
| Prepayments | 26,657 | 20,564 | |
| GST Receivable | - | - | |
| TOTAL | 125,697 | 194,012 | |
|
The carrying value of receivables approximates their fair value. All receivables are deemed collectable and no impairment allowance has been made. | |||
| NOTE 8: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
| Bank Balances | 854,839 | 328,626 | |
| Term Deposits (93 days or less) | 2,255,406 | 2,380,951 | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | 3,110,245 | 2,709,577 | |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS IN THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS | 3,110,245 | 2,709,577 | |
|
The carrying value of short-term deposits with maturity dates of 93 days or less approximates their fair value. The weighted average effective interest rate for term deposits is 4.32% (2009: 4.61%) | |||
| NOTE 9: TERM DEPOSITS (as at Balance Date) | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
| Term Deposits less than 93 days | 2,255,406 | 2,380,951 | |
| Term Deposits greater than 93 days | 2,874,262 | 3,984,450 | |
| TOTAL VALUE OF TERM DEPOSITS | 5,129,668 | 6,365,401 | |
|
The weighted average effective interest rate for term deposits is 4.32% (2009: 4.61%) | |||
| NOTE 10: RECONCILIATION OF SURPLUS FOR THE PERIOD WITH NET CASH FLOWS FROM THE OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
| Surplus/(deficit) for the period | (1,054,554) | (1,247,638) | |
Add back non-cash items
|
82,850 - 86,317 169,167 |
81,214 186 142,939 224,339 | |
Movements in working capital
|
87,703 (6,093) (13,296) 115,850 55,196 36,442 14,763 (15,076) 4,645 |
50,239 (298) (48,217) 15,795 (15,100) (75,934) (55,989) | |
| NET CASH INFLOW/(OUTFLOW) FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | (605,253) | (654,502) | |
| NOTE 11: EMPLOYEE ENTITLEMENTS | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
Current Liabilities
|
151,771 5,450 | 135,725 6,734 | |
| TOTAL | 157,221 | 142,458 | |
| NOTE 12: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
| Trade Payables | 423,105 | 307,255 | |
| GST Payable | 60,722 | 5,528 | |
| Income in advance | 1,799,820 | 1,665,696 | |
| Other non-trade payables and accrued expenses | 151,424 | 146,779 | |
| TOTAL | 2,435,071 | 2,125,258 | |
| Trade payables and other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30-day terms; therefore the carrying value and other payables approximates their fair value. | |||
| NOTE 13: COUNCIL MEMBER REMUNERATION | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
Chair
|
30,581 26,318 56,899 |
44,975 - 44,975 | |
Council Members
|
13,741 - 14,629 - - - - - - 12,106 12,983 11,122 14,245 12,329 13,710 12,513 5,886 123,264 |
11,916 3,310 14,632 16,089 5,882 7,679 8,128 6,930 3,273 6,780 3,742 9,240 7,336 7,814 7,031 - - 119,782 | |
| TOTAL COUNCIL FEES | 180,163 | 164,757 | |
| There are a number of members whose daily fee is paid directly to their school, centre or organisation. These Council members are being paid by their institutions and appropriately do not accept a payment for services to the Council. The Council has had Director's and officers liability and professional indemnity insurance in place during the financial year in respect of the liability or costs of the Council members and employees. Until 31 January 2010, the Council Chair received a daily meeting fee of up to $700. From 1 February 2010 the Council Chair received a daily meeting fee of up to $655. The Council members received a daily meeting fee of $385 plus a preparatory fee of $192.50. | |||
| NOTE 14: EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION | |||
| 2009/10 Actual $ | 2008/09 Actual $ | ||
| 100,000 – 109,999 | 1 | 3 | |
| 110,000 – 119,999 | 2 | 2 | |
| 120,000 – 129,999 | 1 | - | |
| 130,000 – 139,999 | 1 | - | |
| 160,000 – 169,999 | - | 1 | |
| 170,000 – 179,999 | 1 | - | |
| The Directors total remuneration falls in the 170,000 – 179,999 band. During the year ended 30 June 2010, 1 employee received compensation and other benefits in relation to cessation totalling $39,870 (2009: $4,776). | |||
| NOTE 15: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
| There are no significant events subsequent to balance date. |
| NOTE 16: EXPLANATION OF FINANCIAL VARIANCES FROM BUDGET | |
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
| NOTE 17: RELATED PARTIES | |
| Identity of related parties The Council is an autonomous Crown Entity and receives an annual grant from the Ministry of Education of $178,000 (2009: $178,000) and all conditions of the grant have been met in the financial year. The Council enters into transactions with government departments, State-Owned Enterprises and other Crown Entities. Those transactions occur on an arm's length basis. | |
Audit Report
To the readers of the New Zealand Teachers Council’s financial statements and Statement of service Performance
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010
The Auditor-General is the auditor of the New Zealand Teachers Council (the Council). The Auditor-General has appointed me, Phil Kennerley, using the staff and resources of Audit New Zealand, to carry out the audit on her behalf. The audit covers the financial statements and statement of service performance included in the annual report of the Council for the year ended 30 June 2010.
UNQUALIFIED OPINION
In our opinion:
- The financial statements of the Council on pages 13 to 16:
- comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and
- fairly reflect:
- the Council’s financial position as at 30 June 2010; and
- the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended on that date.
- The statement of service performance of the Council on pages 7 to 11:
- complies with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and
- fairly reflects for each class of outputs:
- its standards of delivery performance achieved, as compared with the forecast standards outlined in the statement of forecast service performance adopted at the start of the financial year; and
- its actual revenue earned and output expenses incurred, as compared with the forecast revenues and output expenses outlined in the statement of forecast service performance adopted at the start of the financial year.
The audit was completed on 15 October 2010, and is the date at which our opinion is expressed.
The basis of our opinion is explained below. In addition, we outline the responsibilities of the Council and the Auditor, and explain our independence.
BASIS OF OPINION
We carried out the audit in accordance with the Auditor-General's Auditing Standards, which incorporate the New Zealand Auditing Standards.
We planned and performed the audit to obtain all the information and explanations we considered necessary in order to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements and statement of service performance did not have material misstatements, whether caused by fraud or error.
Material misstatements are differences or omissions of amounts and disclosures that would affect a reader’s overall understanding of the financial statements and statement of service performance. If we had found material misstatements that were not corrected, we would have referred to them in our opinion.
The audit involved performing procedures to test the information presented in the financial statements and statement of service performance. We assessed the results of those procedures in forming our opinion.
Audit procedures generally include:
- determining whether significant financial and management controls are working and can be relied on to produce complete and accurate data;
- verifying samples of transactions and account balances;
- performing analyses to identify anomalies in the reported data;
- reviewing significant estimates and judgements made by the Council;
- confirming year-end balances;
- determining whether accounting policies are appropriate and consistently applied; and
- determining whether all financial statement and statement of service performance disclosures are adequate.
We did not examine every transaction, nor do we guarantee complete accuracy of the financial statements and statement of service performance.
We evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements and statement of service performance. We obtained all the information and explanations we required to support our opinion above.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COUNCIL AND THE AUDITOR
The Council is responsible for preparing the financial statements and statement of service performance in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand. The financial statements must fairly reflect the financial position of the Council as at 30 June 2010 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended on that date. The statement of service performance must fairly reflect, for each class of outputs, the Council’s standards of delivery performance achieved and revenue earned and expenses incurred, as compared with the forecast standards, revenue and expenses adopted at the start of the financial year. The Council’s responsibilities arise from the Crown Entities Act 2004.
We are responsible for expressing an independent opinion on the financial statements and statement of service performance and reporting that opinion to you. This responsibility arises from section 15 of the Public Audit Act 2001 and the Crown Entities Act 2004.
INDEPENDENCE
When carrying out the audit we followed the independence requirements of the Auditor-General, which incorporate the independence requirements of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.
Other than the audit, we have no relationship with or interests in the Council.
Phil Kennerley
Audit New Zealand
On behalf of the Auditor-General
Wellington, New Zealand
Matters relating to the electronic presentation of the audited financial statements and statement of service performance
This audit report relates to the financial statements and statement of service performance of New Zealand Teachers Council (NZTC) for the year ended 30 June 2010 included on NZTC's website. The Council is responsible for the maintenance and integrity of NZTC's website. We have not been engaged to report on the integrity of NZTC's website. We accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements and statement of service performance since they were initially presented on the website.
The audit report refers only to the financial statements and statement of performance named above. It does not provide an opinion on any other information which may have been hyperlinked to or from the financial statements and statement of service performance. If readers of this report are concerned with the inherent risks arising from electronic data communication they should refer to the published hard copy of the audited financial statements and statement of service performance as well as the related audit report dated 15 October 2010 to confirm the information included in the audited financial statements and statement of service performance presented on this website.
Legislation in New Zealand governing the preparation and dissemination of financial information may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE OF FEES 2009/10
Until 31 January 2010 the Council Chair received a daily meeting fee of up to $700. From 1 February 2010 the Council Chair received a daily meeting fee of up to $655. Council members receive a daily meeting fee of $385 plus a preparatory fee of $192.50.
Additional payment is made for preparation time, including for those on the DT or one of the panels of the CAC.
Remuneration through fees to the Council members is all inclusive and no other consultancy of ex gratia payments or benefits are provided.
There are a number of members whose daily fee is paid directly to their school, centre or organisation. These Council members are being paid by their institutions and appropriately do not accept a payment for services to the Council.
|
DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL The DT Chair receives a daily meeting fee of $900. Members receive a daily meeting fee of $415. | ||
| Kenneth Johnstone: Chair | $22,978 | |
| Barbara Arnott | $815 | |
| Graeme Gilbert | $1,660 | |
| Judith Catton | $1,868 | |
| Lorraine Skiffington | - | |
| Megan Cassidy | $2,023 | |
| Patrick Walsh | $3,416 | |
| Tessa M Hunia | $830 | |
| Vivianne Murphy | $1,205 | |
| COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
The CAC Convenor and Chairs receive a daily meeting fee of $475. Members receive a daily meeting fee of $385. | ||
| Lyn Brash: Convenor | $12,542 | |
| Graeme Oldershaw: Chair | $10,925 | |
| Jain Gaudin: Chair | $13,165 | |
| Alison Stockwell | $6,610 | |
| Denis Cocks | $5,967 | |
| Irene Symes | $2,950 | |
| Jane Culhane | $6,609 | |
| Jenny Varney | $9,090 | |
| Jill Page | $797 | |
| Keith Lees | $10,395 | |
| Margaret Smith | $578 | |
| Pat Newman | $5,240 | |
| Sandy Radford | $8,470 | |
| Stephanie Norrie | $4,962 | |
| William Noble | $9,795 | |
| EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ADVISORY GROUP | ||
| Helen May: Convenor | $870 | |
| Amanda Coulson | - | |
| Arapera Royal Tanaera | - | |
| Barbara Backshall | $449 | |
| Eneleata Tapusoa | $215 | |
| Hinerangi Korewha | $191 | |
| Jacqui Heywood | - | |
| Margaret Barclay | $382 | |
| Valarie Kay Lloyd-Jones | $968 | |
| MĀORI MEDIUM ADVISORY GROUP
| ||
| Tony Trinick: Convenor
|
$1,305
|
|
| Arthur Savage
|
$621
|
|
| Hineihaea Murphy
|
$1,290
|
|
| Liz Patara
|
$285
|
|
| Patricia Haromi Williams
|
$1,218
|
|
| Piripi Blake
|
-
|
|
| Robyn Hata
|
$435
|
|
| Winnie Emery
|
$538
|
|
DIRECTORY
New Zealand Teachers Council
Te Pouherenga Kaiako o Aotearoa
PO Box 5326
Level 7
93 The Terrace
Wellington
Telephone: (04) 471 0852
Facsimile: (04) 471 0870
Email: inquiries@teacherscouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz
Legal Counsel
Harbour Chambers
Level 10
Equinox House
111 The Terrace
Wellington
Auditor
Audit New Zealand
Level 8
St Paul's Square
45 Pipitea Street
Wellington
Accountants
Grant Thornton
Level 13
AXA Building
80 The Terrace
Wellington
Insurers
Marsh Insurance Limited
PO Box 699
Wellington
Bankers
Bank of New Zealand
North End Branch
100 Lambton Quay
Wellington

