Annual Report 2009 - 2010

 

Contents

 

   From the Chair and Director
   About the New Zealand Teachers Council
      Statement of Purpose
      Our Functions
      Governance
      Strategic Focus: Effective Teachers
   Outcomes Framework 2009/10
      Achievements against the Statement of Intent
   Performance Highlights
      The Year at a Glance
      Key Developments
   Statement of Objectives and Service Performance
      Output 1: Teacher Registration
      Output 2: Professional Standards
      Output 3: Professional Leadership
      Output 4: Teacher Education
   Reconciliation of Outputs to the Statement of Comprehensive Income
   Assessing Organisational Health and Capability
      People
      Information Communications Technology
      Financial Strategy
   Financial Statements
      Statement of Responsibility
      Statement of Comprehensive Income
      Statement of Movements in Equity
      Statement of Financial Position
      Statement of Cash Flows
      Statement of Contingent Liabilities
      Statement of Commitments
      Significant Accounting Policies
      Notes to the Financial Statements
   Audit Report
   Supporting Information
      Disclosure of Fees2009/10
      Directory

 


FROM THE CHAIR AND DIRECTOR

Return to contents

 

Teachers play a key role in promoting learning for children and young people in early childhood education settings and schools. Through setting and maintaining standards for entry to the profession, the New Zealand Teachers Council (the Council) continue to significantly influence the quality of the teaching profession.

 

Selection into an approved initial teacher education programme is the beginning of the journey. The second stage is reached when a student successfully graduates from an approved programme and is granted provisional registration. After undertaking a period of induction, the provisionally registered teacher is then able to take the third key step – being endorsed to move from provisional registration to full registration.

 

These key entry points have been the Council’s major focus over the last financial year. In particular, the following initiatives have been undertaken:

  • Consultation on the development of revised requirements and processes for approving and monitoring initial teacher education programmes, including the implementation of the recently introduced standards for graduating teachers.
  • The piloting and implementation of quality induction programmes for all provisionally registered teachers and training and support for mentor teachers.
  • The implementation of revised standards and assurance processes for granting full registration for provisionally registered teachers and for the renewal of practising certificates.

 

The Council successfully piloted revised criteria for registering teachers as full members of the profession. It gazetted the Registered Teacher Criteria in December 2009 to replace the current Satisfactory Teacher Dimensions. It has begun a series of national workshops to familiarise professional leaders and teachers with these criteria, in preparation for their adoption from January 2011.

 

Beside setting requirements by which teachers can enter the profession, the Council also set conditions under which teachers are able to remain as members of the teaching profession. The Council receive complaints and mandatory reports relating to the behaviour and competence of teachers. There are clearly established rules and processes by which these reports and complaints are investigated and considered by the Council, its disciplinary bodies and competence assessors. It is also acknowledged that there are health issues that may arise which prevent teachers being able to fully meet their professional obligations. For this reason, the Impairment Committee was established in 2009 to assess and assist teachers with impairments.

 

The Council consulted with the profession about the need for a registration fee increase. The registration fee has not been increased since 2002 and quite simply, since 2002, the Council’s work has expanded and costs have gone up. The Council signalled the need for a review of the current fee as early as 2007. The new registration fee increase will take effect from 1 July 2010.

 

The past year has seen many of the Council projects come to fruition. We acknowledge the support and engagement of the profession in our various consultations, workshops and pilots. It is your voice and perspective that has shaped our professional leadership programmes, ensuring their future success. We acknowledge the hard work and expertise of the Council board members and staff in growing the organisation’s capability to meet the needs of teachers.

 

Alison McAlpine QSO JP

New Zealand Teachers Council

Chair

15 October 2010

Peter Lind

New Zealand Teachers Council

Director

15 October 2010

 

 

 

ABOUT THE NEW ZEALAND TEACHERS COUNCIL

Return to contents

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Return to contents

The New Zealand Teachers Council is an autonomous Crown Entity established under the Education Act 1989.
Its purpose as stated in the Act is:

 

...to provide professional leadership in teaching, enhance the professional status of teachers in schools and early childhood education, and contribute to a safe and high quality teaching and learning environment for children and other learners.”

 

OUR FUNCTIONS

Return to contents

  • Setting the standards for entering the teaching profession and maintaining on-going membership.
  • Setting the requirements for and approving initial teacher education programmes.
  • Carrying out processes for efficient registration of teachers.
  • Carrying out processes for investigating and dealing with issues of competence and conduct of teachers.
  • Commissioning or carrying out research to support quality teaching and the other functions of the Council.
  • Communicating with the profession to support teachers’ knowledge and understanding of the standards and commitments of the teaching profession, including the Code of Ethics for Registered Teachers.
  • Consulting on key policy developments.

 

GOVERNANCE

Return to contents

 

Alison McAlpine Chair
Jenny Varney Elected by Early Childhood Teachers
Ken Wilson Elected by Primary School Teachers
Megan Cassidy Elected by Secondary School Teachers
Pat Newman Elected by Principals
Louise Green New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI)
Diane Wills Post Primary Teachers' Association (PPTA)
Barbara Arnott New Zealand School Trustees Association (NZSTA)
Kevin Knight Ministerial Appointment
Lyn Brash Ministerial Appointment
Makoha Gardiner Ministerial Appointment

 

 

During 2009/10 the Council farewelled its Chair Kathy Smith and welcomed new Chair Alison McAlpine. Alison has extensive experience as a secondary school teacher, principal, member of Secondary Principals Association of New Zealand Executive Committee, and has been involved with UNESCO and the United Nations. Alison is also a current member of the New Zealand Qualifications Authority Board.

 

The Council also welcomed new members Makoha Gardiner and Kevin Knight, both by ministerial appointment. Makoha Gardiner is an experienced kaiako, Head of Department Māori and Deputy Principal, with strong Māori language skills and expertise in conflict management and resolution. She has served over 12 years as Secretary for Te Arawa Pouako i te Reo and has been involved in Māori medium initiatives with both the Ministry of Education and New Zealand Qualifications Authority. Makoha was Chief Examiner for University Bursary Te Reo Rangatira 2000/03.

 

Kevin Knight is an experienced teacher and principal, and a founding director of the New Zealand Graduate School of Education. Kevin was also an educational psychologist before becoming a teacher educator, and has significant expertise in classroom behaviour management and teacher mentoring.

 

The Council has two standing committees: the Audit and Risk Management Committee, and the Professional Leadership Committee.

There are two advisory bodies to the Council: the Māori Medium Advisory Group, and the Early Childhood Education Advisory Group.

The Council also has various bodies to consider conduct and competence issues, including the Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC), Impairment Committee and Disciplinary Tribunal (DT).

 

STRATEGIC FOCUS: EFFECTIVE TEACHERS

Return to contents

For 2009/10 the Council continued to focus on key entry points into the profession, as levers to support and improve quality teaching. We have also worked on strengthening the standards for gaining, supporting and maintaining membership of the profession. Particular initiatives undertaken during the year are outlined on the following pages.

 

 

 

OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK 2009/10

Return to contents

 

STRATEGIC
OUTCOMES
Government
  • Children from all communities participating in high quality early childhood education
  • Every child achieving literacy and numeracy levels that enable their continuing engagement in learning
  • All young people with skills and qualifications that enable them to contribute to their and New Zealand's future.

 

Education Sector
  • Ka Hikitia, Pasifika Education Plan, NZ Curriculum, Te Marautanga o Aotearoa, Te Whāriki, Tertiary Education Strategy, Early Childhood Education Strategic Plan, Nga Huarahu Arataki.

 

New Zealand Teachers Council
  • A professional body of teachers in Aotearoa New Zealand providing safe, high quality teaching for all children and young people in schools/kura and early childhood education (ECE) settings.
         
COUNCIL
OUTCOMES
  • All children and young people are effectively taught by registered teachers who meet and maintain the standards and professional commitments set for the profession.
  • All provisionally registered teachers (PRTs) are supported with effective induction and mentoring programmes as they move towards full registration.
  • All graduates of initial teacher education (ITE) programmes are effectively prepared to begin to teach.
         
IMPACTS
  • All teachers employed in schools, and progressively in early childhood settings, meet the standards for registration as a teacher.

 

  • The Council's guidelines and requirements for quality induction programmes and professional support for mentor teachers are applied by schools and ECE services that employ PRTs.
  • The profession knows about and can apply in their practice the standards, requirements and guidelines developed by the Council, and knows the rationale/ evidence base for these.
  • All ITE programmes meet the Council requirements and assess graduates against the Graduating Teacher Standards.

 

         
OUTPUT CLASSES Teacher Registration
  • Maintain rigorous and efficient processing of registration applications.

 

Professional Standards
  • Maintain effective processes for considering conduct and competence of teachers.
 Professional Leadership
  • Provide effective policy advice and research to advance the strategic initiatives of the Council.
 Teacher Education
  • Maintain effective processes for evaluation, approvals and monitoring of ITE programmes.
         
INPUTS Provide professional leadership to and regulation of teachers through functions of:
  • ITE
  • Registration
  • Conduct and competence
  • Professional leadership.

 

Organisational Capability

 

 

ACHIEVEMENTS AGAINST THE STATEMENT OF INTENT

Return to contents

Several measures given in the Council's 2009/12 Statement of Intent will be achieved progressively over the three years. The milestones reached in the 2009/10 financial year are outlined below.

 

 

OUTCOME 1: ALL GRADUATES OF INITIAL TEACHER EDUCATION (ITE) PROGRAMMES ARE EFFECTIVELY PREPARED TO BEGIN TO TEACH

This year the Council focused on achieving consistently well-prepared graduates from all ITE programmes in the future, by way of strengthening the requirements for the approval and monitoring of ITE programmes. We also aimed to ensure that graduates in Māori medium settings are well-prepared to begin to teach, by developing an understanding of the level of reo proficiency they will require.

 

PERFORMANCE MILESTONES

Level of engagement during development of revised ITE requirements

  • The Council developed new proposed requirements for the approval and monitoring of ITE programmes, and has achieved a good level of engagement with the sector during the consultation stage.
  • Comprehensive consultation continues.

 

Level of consensus reached on what constitutes reo proficiency of graduates prepared to teach effectively in Māori medium settings

  • Research, policies and initiatives of other agencies in the sector have been synthesised and a final report approved for publication.

 

 

 

OUTCOME 2: EFFECTIVE INDUCTION AND MENTORING PROGRAMMES SUPPORT PROVISIONALLY REGISTERED TEACHERS AS THEY MOVE TOWARD FULL REGISTRATION

High quality induction and mentoring support during the initial teaching years is critical to the successful ongoing development of newly-qualified teachers. The Council has initiated several pilots to trial the draft guidelines for induction and mentoring programmes. The guidelines will form the basis of a strong support framework for both provisionally registered teachers and their mentors.

 

PERFORMANCE MILESTONES

Evaluation of data from induction and mentoring pilot programmes

  • One of the pilot programmes (in early childhood education) was completed with a final report submitted and the other three programmes continued into their second year.
  • External evaluation across all the pilot programmes continued with Phase 3 of the evaluation plan investigating impact of the pilots on mentor teachers and on provisionally registered teachers.

 

 

OUTCOME 3: ALL CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE ARE EFFECTIVELY TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WHO MEET AND MAINTAIN THE STANDARDS AND PROFESSIONAL COMMITMENTS SET FOR THE PROFESSION

The Council's work towards high standards for the profession is a significant contribution to assuring learners, parents, employers and the public that teachers are equipped to be effective in their role. So that we provide assurance of teacher effectiveness from many perspectives, work in this area is contributed to by all Council business units, and is varied across several projects and processes.

 

PERFORMANCE MILESTONES

Identify trends on use of unregistered teachers/Limited Authority to Teach (LAT) to cover teaching positions

  • Legislation in May 2010 enabling the Council-Ministry of Education data matching will assist us to identify those employed in a teaching position without a current practising certificate/authority to teach.

Evaluate impact of the Registered Teacher Criteria communications plan

  • A national tour of workshops has begun. 873 registrations from professional leaders were received for the initial May-June 2010 workshops which continue until September 2010.
  • Workshop resources were adjusted in response to evaluation feedback and prepared for publication on the Council's website.

Identify trends in enquiries received by the Council

  • Enquiries are monitored and any issues or trends are identified and discussed.

Evaluate effectiveness of competence and disciplinary processes in terms of legislative compliance

  • Evaluations of these processes are underway. An initial review of conduct and competence processes has been completed.

 

 

 

PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Return to contents

THE YEAR AT A GLANCE

Return to contents

  • Approved 12,699 new applications and re-applications for registration (2008/09: 12,387).
  • Approved the renewal of 20,497 practising certificates for fully registered teachers (2008/09: 24,615).
  • Finalised 5,067 teachers from provisional or subject to confirmation registration to full registration (2008/09: 4,499).
  • Approved or re-approved 23 initial teacher education programmes (2008/09: 20).
  • The CAC resolved 235 mandatory reports/complaints (2008/09: 186).
  • The CAC referred 22 cases to the DT (2008/09: 15).
  • Received 60 reports/complaints regarding teacher competence (2008/09: 27).

 

KEY DEVELOPMENTS

Return to contents

Registered Teacher Criteria

The new Registered Teacher Criteria were finalised, resources developed, and over 40 workshops held throughout New Zealand to assist professional leaders to implement the new criteria.

 

Induction and mentoring

During 2009/10, pilot programmes continued to trial various models for the induction and mentoring of provisionally registered teachers, and training and support for their mentor teachers.

 

Initial teacher education programme approval and monitoring requirements

Proposed new requirements for the approval and monitoring of initial teacher education programmes were developed and released for consultation with providers and the sector.

 

Impairment Committee

The Impairment Committee was established to assess and assist teachers with impairments. The Committee commenced on 22 September 2009 and by the end of the 2009/10 financial year is monitoring 13 teachers through this process.

 

Website refresh

The refresh of the Council’s website www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz was launched this year. This project, begun in 2008, has opened up significant opportunities going forward: we are now moving toward more dynamic, fluid and regular communications with teachers, the sector and the public.

 

Fee increase for triennial practising certificates

Confirmation of the practising certificate fee increase from $120 to $216 effective 1 July 2010 was communicated extensively over the last quarter, including an additional reminder to those eligible for the lower fee.

 

Data match project

The passing of the Education Amendment Act in May 2010 authorised an information matching programme between the Council and the Ministry of Education for those employed in a teaching position, and an initial data match took place.

 

 

 

STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND SERVICE PERFORMANCE

Return to contents

 

OUTPUT 1: TEACHER REGISTRATION

Return to contents

Maintain rigorous and efficient processing of registration applications

 

 

NOTES

 

  • A secure electronic vet request system has been established with New Zealand Police, enabling greater interagency efficiency and more rapid turnaround on vet results in the second half of the year. This will also enable the further development of online registration.

 

  • Timeliness for issue of practising certificates has stayed well above the standard that 80% of applications are approved within six weeks.

 

  • From 1 July 2009 a late fee was introduced for those without a current practising certificate or authorisation to teach when they apply and who are employed in a teaching position. This has lead to a greater awareness of registration requirements. The late fee, together with the data match process, has helped to reduce the number of those unlawfully employed as professional leaders and teachers are now more diligent about complying.

 

  • In the lead up to the 1 July 2010 fee increase, many teachers (dependent on eligibility) applied to renew their practising certificate early. This lead to an increase in applications received over what had been expected, particularly in June 2010.

 

 

HOW WE PERFORMED

 

QUANTITY      
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Estimated 2008/09 Actual
Applications for registration
  • Approved
  • Declined
  • Closed

 

12,699
101 (0.8%)
746 (5.9%)

 

13,480
Less than 1%
Less than 5%

 

12,387
97
972
Practising certificate renewal
  • Approved
  • Declined
  • Closed

 

20,497
314 (1.5%)
239 (1.2%)

 

16,400
Less than 2%
Less than 2%

 

24,615
627
273
Provisional/Subject to Confirmation to Full
  • Approved
  • Declined
  • Closed

 

5,067
87 (1.7%)
395 (7.8%)

 

4,702
Less than 3%
Less than 5%

 

4,499
143
402
LAT
  • Approved
  • Declined
  • Closed

 

1,097
.7%)
24 (20.4%)

 

1,371
Less than 2%
Less than 35%

 

829
-*
-*

 

Applications are declined when they do not meet the Councils policy requirements (e.g. insufficient qualifications, recent teaching service, language proficiency and/or good character). Applications are closed if the applicant has failed to respond satisfactorily to more than four requests for information.
       
       
TIMELINESS      
  2009/10 Actual Standard 2008/09 Actual
Application for registration (6 weeks) 91.66% 80% 94%
Practising certificate renewal (6 weeks) 85.07% 80% 95%
Provisional/Subject to Confirmation to Full (4 weeks) 99.37% 80% 99%
LAT (4 weeks) 82.58% 80% -*
       
       
QUALITY      
  2009/10 Actual Standard 2008/09 Actual
All teacher quality assurance activities are made in accordance with the Education Act 1989 and the Council’s policies and procedures Always Always Always
       
       
COST      
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Budget 2008/09 Actual
Revenue $2,223,201 $1,935,823 $1,993,347
Expenditure $1,707,066 $1,805,672 $1,759,655
Surplus/(Deficit) $516,135 $130,151 $233,692

 

*New measure for 2009/10.

 

 

OUTPUT 2: PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS

Return to contents

Maintain effective processes for considering conduct and competence of teachers

 

NOTES

 

  • Number of complaints/mandatory reports received and resolved by the CAC has increased significantly since 2008/09. This is consistent with a rise in the number of teachers with current practising certificates (95,000+ in 2009/10 compared to 90,000+ in 2008/09), and is also likely to reflect awareness of and confidence in the Council's conduct and competence processes.

 

  • Number of cases referred to the DT is steadily increasing.

 

  • Total number of active files with the CAC as at 2009/10 financial year end is 114.

 

  • Although the number of complaints increased in 2009/10 it is very small when compared to the total number of teachers registered with a current practising certificate.

 

 

HOW WE PERFORMED

 

QUALITY      
  2009/10 Actual Standard 2008/09 Actual
Decisions are made in accordance with the requirements of the Education Act 1989 and the New Zealand Teachers Council Rules Always Always Always
       
       
QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS*    
  2009/10 Actual Standard 2008/09 Actual
Complaints / mandatory reports received by CACs 265 120 204
Complaints / mandatory reports resolved by CACs 235 120 186
Cases referred by CAC to DT 22 15 15
Referrals from CAC to impairment process** 20 15 -
Referrals from Council to impairment process** 2 15 -
Cases determined by DT 14 15 13
Referrals from DT to impairment process** 0 15 -
Competency complaints / mandatory reports received 60 50 27
Competency cases being monitored within a 3 year period 30 50 -***
Competency complaints / mandatory reports resolved 22 50 28
Referrals from CAC to competence 6 15 12
Conduct/competence cases resolved by the Council 28 50 25

 

*Timeliness has been impacted by factors such as co-operation of other parties, extent of investigation required, and external processes (e.g. Police investigations, court hearings). **No Impairment Committee figures for 2008/09 as the Committee was established in 2009/10. ***New measure for 2009/10.
 
       
COST      
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Budget 2008/09 Actual
Revenue $1,056,576 $1,007,797 $990,107
Expenditure $1,446,761 $1,443,262 $1,380,304
Surplus/(Deficit) ($390,185) ($435,465) ($390,197)

 

 

OUTPUT 3: PROFESSIONAL LEADERSHIP

Return to contents

Provde effective policy advice and research to advance the strategic initiatives of the Council

 

 

NOTES

 

  • Final Registered Teacher Criteria were approved, published and implementation began via a national workshop tour. In 2011 these standards will replace the Satisfactory Teacher Dimensions as the standards for gaining and maintaining full registration. Resources to support professional leaders to implement the Registered Teacher Criteria have been developed. The Registered Teacher Criteria handbook and poster have been published in English and Māori, distributed to schools/kura and early childhood education services, and posted to the Council's website.

 

  • Consultation on an overarching registration policy was completed. The Council has now agreed on aspects of development that need to be progressed to shape the policy.

 

  • Induction and mentoring pilot programme continues. Interim findings are analysed as they emerge.

 

  • Generating comparative or baseline figures is not possible for this output class due to work being project based and varying each year.

 

 

HOW WE PERFORMED

 

QUALITY    
  2009/10 Actual Standard
Policy and research comply with Council guidelines Always Always
Policy and research projects are delivered to the agreed quality, deadlines and budget Always* Always

 

*Projects have met milestone deadlines except where the Council have deferred target dates or where contractors have been asked for further information to meet milestone requirements.
     
     
QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS    
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Estimated
 Consult with the profession to develop an overarching registration policy
  • Analyse and respond to feedback from professional leaders on key issues
  • Develop and consult on the draft policy

 

Completed
Completed

 

Complete by October 2009 Complete by February 2010
     
Finalise and phase-in implementation of Registered Teacher Criteria
  • Analyse and respond to data from 2009 trial and other sources to finalise the criteria with sector agreement
  • Implement communication plan to promulgate and phase-in the criteria from January 2010

 

Final criteria approved and published
National workshops underway

 

Complete by December 2009

Evaluate effectiveness and strategy
     
Monitor and evaluate induction and mentoring pilots
  • Monitor milestone reports for 1 and 2 year pilots and the evaluation contract
  • Begin to analyse interim findings as they emerge for any policy implications

 

 

Milestones met
Interim findings analysed
Continuing

 

Milestone dates as per contracts
Discussion paper by July 2010
Investigate the reo proficiency required of graduates of Māori medium ITE programmes
  • Synthesise relevant research, policies and initiatives from agencies and the sector that inform identification of reo proficiencies required for teaching effectively in Māori medium settings
  • Identify further research/policy development required to translate findings into the Council requirements for approval and monitoring of Māori medium ITE programmes

 

 

Final report approved for publication

 

Continuing due to delay in final report completion

 

 

Literature review by October 2009

 

 

By March 2010

 

     
Review of the Governance arrangements and functions of the Council
  • Consultation on draft options and analysis of consultative findings

 

Deferred to 2010/11

 

By July 2010

 

     
COST      
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Budget 2008/09 Actual
Revenue $1,090,536 $1,017,645 $1,275,425
Expenditure $2,399,354 $2,734,485 $2,519,864
Surplus/(Deficit) ($1,308,818) ($1,716,840) ($1,244,439)

 

 

OUTPUT 4: TEACHER EDUCATION

Return to contents

Maintain effective processes for evaluation, approvals and monitoring of ITE programmes.

 

 

NOTES

 

  • Proposed new requirements for the approval and monitoring of ITE programmes are being developed.

 

  • Timeframes for completion of the new requirements were extended to enable wider consultation with programme providers and the wider education sector.

 

  • 23 ITE programmes were approved/re-approved in 2009/10.

 

 

HOW WE PERFORMED

 

QUALITY      
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Estimated 2008/09 Actual
All decisions are consistent with the Council standards and guidelines for approvals of ITE programmes and relevant legislation

 

Always Always Always
     
QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS    
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Estimated
Development of new approval and monitoring system for ITE programmes
  • Set requirements for ITE programmes
  • Determine an approval and monitoring process for the Council
  • Consult with the sector on proposed process

 

Extended
Extended
Extended

 

Complete by February 2010 Complete by February 2010 Complete by July 2010
Approval of new ITE programmes 2009/10    
  Universities Institutes / Polytechnics Wananga PTEs
Early childhood - 2 1 2
Primary 1 - 1 1
Secondary - - - -
Total 1 2 2 3
     
Re-approval of existing ITE programmes 2009/10    
  Universities Institutes / Polytechnics Wananga PTEs
Early childhood 5 - - 2
Primary 3 - 1 1
Secondary 1 - - 2
Total 9 0 1 5
     
  2009/10 Actual 2008/09 Actual
Total programmes considered for approval/
re-approval across all providers
23 20
 
COST      
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Budget 2008/09 Actual
Revenue $481,665 $433,518 $424,085
Expenditure $357,813 $401,111 $299,818
Surplus/(Deficit) $123,852 $32,407 $124,267

 

 

 

RECONCILIATION OF OUTPUTS TO THE STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Return to contents

 

NON-TEACHER POLICE VETTING*
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Budget 2008/09 Actual
Revenue $141,125 $84,455 $180,070
Expenditure $136,663 $86,709 $151,031
Surplus/(Deficit) $4,462 ($2,254) $29,039
       

 

RECONCILIATION      
  2009/10 Actual 2009/10 Budget 2008/09 Actual
Teacher Registration $516,135 $130,151 $233,692
Professional Standards ($390,185) ($435,465) ($390,197)
Professional Leadership ($1,308,818) ($1,716,840) ($1,244,439)
Teacher Education $123,852 $32,407 $124,267
Net Surplus/(Deficit) Outputs ($1,059,016) ($1,989,747) ($1,276,677)
Non-Teacher Police Vetting* $4,462 ($2,255) $29,039
Net Surplus/(Deficit) ($1,054,554) ($1,992,002) ($1,247,638)
*Due to the passing of the Education Amendment Act 2010 and effective 21 May 2010, the Council is no longer responsible for Non-Teacher Police Vetting.

 

Note: The 2009/10 Budget figures shown here are true and correct. Variation from the budget figures given in the Council's 2009/12 Statement of Intent are due to a printing error during publication.

 

 

 

ASSESSING ORGANISATIONAL HEALTH AND CAPABILITY

Return to contents

PEOPLE

Return to contents

 

STAFF TURNOVER    
  2009/10 2008/09
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff Resignations 40.4 11 42.37 7
PROPORTION 27.23% 16.52%

 

 

GOOD EMPLOYER

 

The Council recognises that equality and diversity are key ingredients for organisational success. We are committed to integrating equality and diversity into all aspects of our work, as this will enable us to improve our services and to retain and attract talented staff.

 

The Council's 2009/12 Statement of Intent identified that the achievement of several measures would enable the evaluation of its performance as a good employer.

 

Implement a formal Equal Employment Opportunities programme driven by organisational values
  • Findings from the Pay and Employment Equity study showed an overall staff perception that the Council currently provides Equal Employment Opportunities.

 

Ensure procedural fairness is maintained for all human resources strategies, systems and practices during 2009/10
  • Procedural fairness has been maintained.

 

Employment of Māori and Pasifika staff is encouraged at all levels of the organisation
  • Two Māori/Pasifika FTE staff employed this year (total FTE staff employed this year: eight).

 

INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY

Return to contents

 

Several significant developments to Information Communications Technology (ICT) have occurred this year, enabling significant improvements to our processes and progress on current projects.

 

Infrastructure enabling the Council to match its records to the Ministry of Education was completed, and the first data match took place following legislative authorisation in May 2010. This initial match found a small percentage of unmatched records. The small percentage of records in question (remembering that 95,000+ teachers hold a current practising certificate) is likely due to efforts to improve data quality, and promote awareness of the importance of the registration process.

 

An electronic transfer system between the Council and New Zealand Police was launched this year. This allows significant improvements in the turnaround times for processing applications for practising certificates and enables further ICT opportunities.

 

The Council's website was refreshed and the updated site launched in May 2010. This concluded a considerable project to improve the accessibility, relevance and overall look-and-feel of the website.

 

FINANCIAL STRATEGY

Return to contents

 

Reviewed, consulted on, and had new practising certificate fee approved by the Minister, for implementation in July 2010.

 

Despite a deficit in the 2009/10 financial year, the Council maintain a satisfactory level of working capital.

 

The Council continue to maintain a sound financial position through monitoring our financial performance on a monthly basis and conducting quarterly re-forecasts. This enables more transparency and accountability in our business functions.

 

We contract the accounting firm Grant Thornton to conduct monthly reviews of the management accounts to ensure the continuing high quality presentation of financial information to the entity and stakeholders.

 

 

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Return to contents

STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY

Return to contents

 

We accept responsibility for the preparation of the following statements of account and the judgments used therein. The financial statements have been prepared on the basis of generally accepted accounting practice and in accordance with the Crown Entities Act 2004.

 

We acknowledge the establishment and maintenance of internal control procedures and these are considered to be sufficient to provide a reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial and non-financial reporting.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements for the twelve months ended 30 June 2010 fairly reflect the financial position, the results of operations, the cash flows and service performance of the Council.

 

Alison McAlpine QSO JP

New Zealand Teachers Council

Chair

15 October 2010

Barbara Arnott

New Zealand Teachers Council

Chair (Audit & Risk Management Committee)

15 October 2010

 

 

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Return to contents

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010
  Note 2009/10 Actual $ 2009/10 Budget $ 2008/09 Actual $
Income
  • Revenue
  • Other operating income
  • Finance income
Total income

 

1
 
4,718,724
39,543
242,021
5,000,288
 
4,264,582
4,500
210,156
4,479,238
 
4,359,346
18,145
486,469
4,863,960
         
Expenses
  • Employee benefit costs
  • Depreciation and amortisation expense
  • Other operating expenses
Total expenses

3
4, 5
2

 

 
2,720,103
169,167
2,124,482
5,013,752
 
2,743,814
201,528
2,277,140
5,222,482
 
2,508,323
224,153
2,101,132
4,833,608
         
Core operating surplus/(deficit)   (13,464) (743,244) 30,352
Special projects   1,041,090 1,248,758 1,028,837
Council elections   - - 249,153
Net surplus deficit   (1,054,554) (1,992,002) (1,247,638)
Other comprehensive income   - - -
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR   (1,054,554) (1,992,002) (1,247,638)

 

Accompanying accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

STATEMENT OF MOVEMENTS IN EQUITY

Return to contents

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010
  Note 2009/10 Actual $ 2009/10 Budget $ 2008/09 Actual $
Public equity as at 1 July 2009   4,040,657 3,880,596 5,288,295
Total comprehensive income for the year   (1,054,554) (1,992,002) (1,247,638)
Public equity as at 30 June 2010   2,986,103 1,888,594 4,040,657

 

Accompanying accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

Return to contents

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010
  Note 2009/10 Actual $ 2009/10 Budget $ 2008/09 Actual $
Public equity
  • Retained earnings/(losses)
Total public equity
  

 

2,986,103

2,986,103

 

1,888,594

1,888,594

 

4,040,657

4,040,657

Represented by:        
Assets Current assets
  • Other investments
  • Trade and other receivables
  • Cash and cash equivalents
Total current assets Non-current assets
  • Property, plant and equipment
  • Intangible assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets

 

9
7
8

 

4
5

 

2,874,262
125,697
3,110,245

6,110,204

207,453

126,081
333,534
6,443,738

 

2,197,479
75,000

1,788,427

4,060,906

251,103

180,968
432,071
4,492,977

 

3,984,450
194,012

2,709,577

6,888,039

243,569

154,864
398,433
7,286,472

Liabilities Current liabilities
  • Deferred lease liability
  • Trade and other payables
  • Employee entitlements
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
  • Income in advance
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities

 

6
12
11

 

5,025

2,435,071

157,221

2,597,317

 

860,318
860,318
3,457,635

 

21,626

1,174,627

82,500

1,278,753

 

1,325,629
1,325,629
2,604,382

 

20,100

2,125,258

142,458

2,287,816

 

957,999
957,999
3,245,815
NET ASSETS   2,986,103 1,888,594 4,040,657
Working capital
Working capital ratio
  3,512,887
2.35
2,782,153
3.18
4,600,223
3.01

 

Accompanying accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Return to contents

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010
  Note 2009/10 Actual $ 2009/10 Budget $ 2008/09 Actual $
Cash flows from operating activities:

Cash provided from

  • Revenue
  • Other operating income
  • Finance income
Total Cash provided from

Cash applied to

  • Payments to suppliers
  • Payments to employees
  • Net GST refunded/(paid)
Total Cash applied to

NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

4,741,870
39,543

329,724
5,111,137

 

(3,066,244)

(2,705,340)

55,194

(5,716,390)

(605,253)

 

 

3,893,235
4,500

210,156
4,107,891

 

(1,364,318)

(2,743,814)

-

(4,108,132)

(241)

 

 

4,829,951
12,697

536,708
5,379,356

 

(3,434,501)

(2,584,257)

(15,100)

(6,033,858)

(654,502)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Cash provided from

  • Sales of property, plant and equipment
  • Sales of investments
Total Cash provided from

Cash applied to

  • Purchase of property, plant and equipment
  • Purchase of intangible assets
  • Purchase of investments
Total Cash applied to

NET CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

  

 

 

-

 

3,584,925
3,584,925

 

(46,734)

 

(57,535)

(2,474,735)

(2,579,004)

1,005,921

 

 

-

 

-
-

 

(75,500)

 

(85,000)

(353,823)

(514,323)

(514,323)

 

 

-

 

802,042
802,042

 

(90,813)

 

(138,245)

(708,905)

(937,963)

(135,921)

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents   400,668 (514,564) (790,423)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of year 8 2,709,577 2,302,990 3,500,000
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of year 8 3,110,245 1,788,427 2,709,577

 

Operating activities include all transactions and other events that are not investing or financing activities. Investing activities are those activities relating to the acquisition, holding and disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment and of investments. Investments can include securities not falling within the definition of cash. Financing activities are those activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the capital structure. This includes both equity and debt not falling within the definition of cash.

 

Accompanying accounting policies and notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

STATEMENT OF CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Return to contents

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Legal proceedings against New Zealand Teachers Council   10,000 20,000
Personal grievances   - -

 

The New Zealand Teachers Council has identified above those contingent liabilities which it assesses may give rise to liabilities against the Council in the future. The Council is not aware of any personal grievances either impending or underway against the Council as at 30 June 2010 (2009: Nil). The legal proceedings against the Council are those cases that are currently in the Complaints/Disciplinary process as at 30 June 2010. The Council has had one case referred to the District and/or High Court in 2009/10. This is estimated to have legal costs of $10,000. (As at 30 June 2009, there were four cases).

 

 

STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS

Return to contents

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Non-cancellable commitments – operating lease commitments
  • Not more than one year
  • One to two years
  • Two to five years
  • Over five years
   

 

149,621
9,713
-
-
 

 

332,313
149,621
9,713
-

 

The non-cancellable operating lease relates to the lease of three and a half floors of an office building. The lease on three floors was renegotiated in November 2007 and the lease for the remaining half floor was renegotiated in August 2008. The lease is due to expire on 31 October 2010 for levels 6, 7 and 9 and on 27 August 2011 for the level 8 half floor. The Council does not have the option to purchase the asset at the end of the lease term. There are no restrictions placed on the Council by its leasing arrangements.

 

 

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Return to contents

 

REPORTING ENTITY

The Council is an autonomous Crown Entity as defined by the Crown Entities Act 2004 and is domiciled in New Zealand.

The Council’s primary objective is to provide public services, as opposed to making a financial return.

Accordingly, the Council has designated itself as a public benefit entity for the purposes of New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZIFRS).

The financial statements of the Council are for the year ended 30 June 2010, and were approved by the Council on 15 October 2010.

 

BASIS OF PREPARATION

The financial statements of the Council have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Crown Entities Act 2004, which includes the requirement to comply with New Zealand generally accepted accounting practice (NZGAAP).

The Council's financial statements comply with NZIFRS and other applicable Financial Reporting Standards, as appropriate for public benefit entities.

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements.

 

MEASUREMENT BASE

The measurement base adopted is historical cost, except where modified by the measurement of equity investments and derivative financial instruments at fair value.

Currency is in New Zealand dollars ($NZD).

 

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no changes in accounting policies. All policies used for the preparation of the financial statements have been applied on a basis consistent with previous years other than those resulting from the transition to NZIFRS.

 

JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATIONS

The preparation of financial statements in conformity to NZIFRS requires judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. Where material, information on the major assumptions is provided in the relevant accounting policy or in the relevant note.

The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Subsequent actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis.

Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised when the revision affects only that period. If the revision affects both current and future periods, it is reflected in the respective period to which it relates.

 

DIFFERENTIAL REPORTING

The Council qualifies for differential reporting under the NZIFRS Differential Reporting Framework (3.8) with the size criteria exemption (3.9) as total gross income is less than $20 million and total assets are less than $10 million.

The Council has applied the following differential reporting exemptions:

NZ IAS 1 - Presentation of financial statements

  • Note disclosure on accounting and assumptions.
  • Note disclosure on the Council’s capital management policy.

 

NZ IAS 17 – Leases

  • Note disclosure of future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases.

 

NZ IAS 24 – Related party disclosure

  • Note disclosure of key management personnel compensation.

 

NZ IFRS 7 – Financial instruments disclosure

  • Information that enables the users to evaluate the nature and extent or risk arising from financial instruments.
  • Detail or risk arising from credit, liquidity and market risk and how this risk is managed.
  • Qualitative disclosure of risk arising from financial instruments.
  • Quantitative disclosure of risk arising from financial instruments.
  • Details of maximum exposure to credit risk.
  • Analysis of the age of financial assets that are past due.
  • Maturity analysis of financial liabilities.
  • Sensitivity analysis of market risk and other price risk.

 

BUDGET FIGURES

The budget figures are those approved by the Council at the beginning of the financial year. The budget figures have been prepared in accordance with NZ GAAP and are consistent with the accounting policies adopted by the Council for the preparation of the financial statements. They comply with NZIFRS and other applicable Financial Reporting Standards as appropriate for public benefit entities.

 

REVENUE

The Council derives revenue from the following:

  • Registration and practising certificate fees
  • Limited Authority to Teach fees
  • Overseas fees
  • Late fees
  • Teacher education programme approval income
  • Other revenue

 

Interest income is recognised using the effective interest method.

All other revenue is recognised when earned and is reported in the financial period to which it relates.

 

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (GST)

All items in the financial statements are presented exclusive of GST, except for receivables and payables, which are presented on a GST inclusive basis. Where GST is not recoverable as an input tax then it is recognised as part of the related asset or expense.

The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) is included as part of the receivables or payables in the Statement of Financial Position.

The net GST paid to, or received from the IRD, including the GST relating to investing and financing activities, is classified as an operating cash flow in the statement of cash flows.

Commitments and contingencies are disclosed exclusive of GST.

 

INCOME TAX

The Council is a public authority in terms of the Income Tax Act 2004 and consequently is exempt from income tax.

 

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable are measured at their carrying value which approximates their fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any provision for impairment.

Bad debts are written off during the period in which they are identified.

 

CREDITORS AND OTHER PAYABLES

Creditors and other payables are initially measured at their carrying values, which approximate their fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise deposits with banks together with bank and cash balances, net of bank overdrafts. Term deposits with terms of 93 days or less are classified as cash and cash equivalents.

 

TERM DEPOSITS

Investment in term deposits are initially measured at their carrying value which approximates their fair value plus transaction costs if any.

After initial recognition the term deposits are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

For all term deposits, the Council considers whether, at each balance date, there is objective evidence that the Council will not be able to collect amounts due according to the original terms of the deposit. There were no impaired term deposits in the 2009/10 financial year.

 

RECOGNITION OF COST, ADDITIONS, DISPOSALS AND DEPRECIATION

Items of Property, Plant and Equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.

Depreciation is charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Income using the straight-line method. Depreciation is set at rates that will write off the cost or fair value of the assets, less their estimated residual values, over their useful lives. The estimated useful life and resulting rates are as follows:

 

Class of Asset

Estimated Life Depreciation Rate
Office Equipment
Computer Equipment
Furniture and Fittings
Office Fit-out
5 years
3 years
15 years
5 years
20%
33.3%
6.7%
20%

 

The residual value of assets is reassessed annually.

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised as an asset only when it is probable that future economic benefits or service potential associated with the item will flow to the Council and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Where an asset is acquired at no cost, or obtained for a nominal cost, it is recognised at fair value when control over the asset is obtained.

Where an item of plant and equipment is disposed of, the gain or loss recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income is calculated as the difference between the net sale price and the carrying amount of the asset.

Costs incurred subsequent to initial acquisition are capitalised only when it is probable that future economic benefits or service potential associated with the item will flow to the Council and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The costs of day-to-day servicing of property, plant and equipment are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as they are incurred.

 

RECOGNITION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND AMORTISATION

These are comprised of software acquisition and development including upgrades of existing software.

Amortisation is charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Income on a straight-line basis over the useful life. The estimated useful life is as follows:

 

  Estimated Life Amortisation Rate
Acquired Software Developed Software 3 years 3 years 33% 33%

 

The intangible assets above are deemed to have finite lives.

Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and to bring to use the specific software. Costs that are directly associated with the development of software for internal use by the Council, are recognised as an intangible asset. Direct costs include the software development, employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads.

Staff training costs are recognised as an expense when incurred. Costs associated with maintaining computer software are recognised as an expense when incurred. Costs associated with the development and maintenance of the Council's website are recognised as an expense when incurred.

 

IMPAIRMENT OF NON-FINANCIAL ASSETS

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets that have a finite useful life are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the assets carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an assets fair value less costs to sell and value in use.

If an asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is impaired and the carrying amount is written down to the recoverable amount.

The total impairment loss, or reversal of an impairment loss, is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

 

EMPLOYEE ENTITLEMENTS

Short-term employee entitlements:

  • Salaries and wages accrued up to balance date
  • Annual leave earned, but not yet taken at balance date
  • Sick leave.

The Council does not have bonus schemes or long service leave available to staff.

 

SUPERANNUATION SCHEMES

Obligations for contributions to KiwiSaver and the Government Superannuation Fund are recognised as an expense in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as incurred.

 

OPERATING LEASES

Operating lease payments, such as rent, where the lessors effectively retain substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the leased items, are included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. Operating lease expenses are recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

 

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Council uses financial instruments as part of its normal operations. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, debtors, term deposits, and creditors. All financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Financial Position and all revenues and expenses in relation to financial instruments are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income. All financial instruments are recognised and stated at fair value.

 

COST ALLOCATION

The Council has four output classes outlined in the Statement of Intent. These are Teacher Registration, Maintenance of Professional Standards, Professional Leadership and Teacher Education. The Council has derived the cost of each output using the system outlined below:

  • Direct costs are directly attributable to an output and are charged directly to the outputs.
  • Indirect costs are those that cannot be identified in an economically feasible manner with a specific output. Charges to outputs are based on appropriate cost drivers such as actual usage, staff numbers and floor area.

 

 

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Return to contents

 

NOTE 1: REVENUE      
  2009/10 Actual $ 2009/10 Budget $ 2008/09 Actual $
Fees 3,624,094 3,373,288 3,538,099
Limited Authority to Teach 56,219 67,050 46,636
Non-Teacher Police Vetting 141,031 84,455 179,880
Provisional/Subject to Confirmation to Full 388,083 334,345 345,417
Crown 178,000 178,000 178,000
Teacher education approvals 68,501 42,000 46,619
Discipline recovered 4,484 5,000 24,694
Overseas teacher fees 97,705 113,778 -
Late fees 160,606 66,667 -
TOTAL 4,718,724 4,264,582 4,359,346

 

NOTE 2: OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
  2009/10 Actual $ 2009/10 Budget $ 2008/09 Actual $
Administrative 1,234,804 1,259,012 1,232,409
Audit fees to Auditors
  • External Audit
  • Other Services

 

37,780
2,080

 

55,000
-

 

36,580
-
Professional/Consultancy fees 68,559 32,400 45,034
Advisory committees 20,237 39,861 38,337
Council member fees 180,163 212,573 164,757
Complaints/discipline 260,277 361,055 269,219
Rent 317,239 317,239 314,610
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment - - 186
Doubtful debts 3,343 - -
TOTAL 2,124,482 2,277,140 2,101,132

 

NOTE 3: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT COSTS    
  2009/10 Actual $ 2009/10 Budget $ 2008/09 Actual $
Wages and salaries 2,531,516 2,585,633 2,338,613
Staff professional development 18,061 64,641 55,826
Superannuation 45,626 39,923 30,494
Kiwisaver employer contribution 23,242 26,238 5,461
Temporary staff 85,043 10,320 61,049
ACC levies 12,148 11,050 11,430
Payroll fees 4,468 6,010 5,449
TOTAL 2,720,103 2,743,814 2,508,323

 

NOTE 4: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

  Computer Equipment $ Office
Equipment $
Office
Fit-out $
Fixtures and Fittings $ Work in
Progress $
TOTAL

$

Balance at 30 June 2010
Cost
Accumulated Depreciation and Impairment
Carrying Value

 

207,349

176,094
31,255

 

133,625

88,581
45,044

 

284,504

249,036
35,468

 

163,291

67,605
95,686

 

-
-
-

 

788,769

581,316
207,453

Balance at 30 June 2009
Cost
Accumulated Depreciation and Impairment
Carrying Value

 

268,479
237,177

31,302

 

141,928
101,387

40,541

 

284,504
213,760

70,744

 

157,816
56,834

100,982

 

-
-
-

 

852,727
609,158

243,569

 

NOTE 5: INTANGIBLE ASSETS  
  Acquired Software $
Balance at 30 June 2010
Cost
Amortisation and Impairment Losses
Carrying Amount

 

645,692
519,611
126,081
Balance at 30 June 2009
Cost
Amortisation and Impairment Losses
Carrying Amount

 

588,157
433,293
154,864

 

Intangibles are reviewed for impairment annually. There have been no indications of impairment in 2010 (2009: nil). The intangible assets have a useful life of three years.

 

NOTE 6: DEFERRED LEASE LIABILITY
This liability reflects the building owner contribution and rent holiday provided to the Council upon taking the lease for its premises at 93 The Terrace, Wellington. These contributions will be fully amortised by October 2010.

 

NOTE 7: TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Trade Receivables   64,967 48,329
Less: Provision for Doubtful Debts   (3,343) -
Accrued Interest   37,416 125,119
Prepayments   26,657 20,564
GST Receivable   - -
TOTAL   125,697 194,012

 

The carrying value of receivables approximates their fair value. All receivables are deemed collectable and no impairment allowance has been made.

 

NOTE 8: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Bank Balances   854,839 328,626
Term Deposits (93 days or less)   2,255,406 2,380,951
Cash and Cash Equivalents   3,110,245 2,709,577
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS IN THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS   3,110,245 2,709,577

 

The carrying value of short-term deposits with maturity dates of 93 days or less approximates their fair value. The weighted average effective interest rate for term deposits is 4.32% (2009: 4.61%)

 

NOTE 9: TERM DEPOSITS (as at Balance Date)
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Term Deposits less than 93 days   2,255,406 2,380,951
Term Deposits greater than 93 days   2,874,262 3,984,450
TOTAL VALUE OF TERM DEPOSITS   5,129,668 6,365,401

 

The weighted average effective interest rate for term deposits is 4.32% (2009: 4.61%)

 

NOTE 10: RECONCILIATION OF SURPLUS FOR THE PERIOD WITH NET CASH FLOWS FROM THE OPERATING ACTIVITIES
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Surplus/(deficit) for the period   (1,054,554) (1,247,638)
Add back non-cash items
  • Depreciation and assets written off
  • Loss/(gain) on sale of fixed assets
  • Amortisation
Total non-cash items
 

 

82,850
-
86,317
169,167

 

81,214
186
142,939
224,339
Movements in working capital
  • (increase)/decrease in accrued interest
  • (increase)/decrease in prepayments
  • (increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
  • (increase)/decrease in trade and other payables
  • (increase)/decrease in GST payable
  • (increase)/decrease in fees received in advance
  • (increase)/decrease in employee benefits
  • (increase)/decrease in deferred lease liability
  • (increase)/decrease in accruals
Net movement in working capital
 

 

87,703
(6,093)
(13,296)

 

115,850
55,196
36,442
14,763
(15,076)

4,645
280,134

 

50,239
(298)
(48,217)

 

15,795

(15,100)
513,375

(75,934)
(15,074)

(55,989)
368,797

NET CASH INFLOW/(OUTFLOW) FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES   (605,253) (654,502)

 

NOTE 11: EMPLOYEE ENTITLEMENTS
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Current Liabilities
  • Liability for annual leave
  • Accrual for sick leave
    151,771 5,450   135,725 6,734
TOTAL   157,221 142,458
       

 

NOTE 12: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Trade Payables   423,105 307,255
GST Payable   60,722 5,528
Income in advance   1,799,820 1,665,696
Other non-trade payables and accrued expenses   151,424 146,779
TOTAL   2,435,071 2,125,258
Trade payables and other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30-day terms; therefore the carrying value and other payables approximates their fair value.

 

NOTE 13: COUNCIL MEMBER REMUNERATION
  2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
Chair
  • Kathy Smith (until 31 January 2010)
  • Alison McAlpine (from 1 February 2010)
Total Chair remuneration
 

 

30,581
26,318
56,899
 

 

44,975
-
44,975
Council Members
  • Barbara Arnott
  • Nola Hambleton (until 30 October 2008)
  • Lyn Brash
  • Margaret Franken (until 15 June 2009)
  • Irene Symes (until 31 December 2008)
  • Diane Leggett (until 31 December 2008)
  • Jill Page (until 30 November 2008)
  • Margaret Smith (until 30 January 2009)
  • Steve Wood (until 3 October 2009)
  • Diane Wills (from 1 January 2009)
  • Jenny Varney (from 1 October 2008)
  • Ken Wilson (from 1 October 2008)
  • Louise Green (from 1 January 2009)
  • Megan Cassidy (from 1 October 2008)
  • Pat Newman (from 1 October 2008)
  • Makoha Gardiner (from 18 November 2009)
  • Kevin Knight (from 18 November 2009)
Total Council members

 

13,741
-
14,629
-
-
-
-
-
-
12,106
12,983
11,122
14,245
12,329
13,710
12,513

5,886

123,264

 

11,916
3,310
14,632
16,089
5,882
7,679
8,128
6,930
3,273
6,780
3,742
9,240
7,336
7,814
7,031
-
-
119,782
TOTAL COUNCIL FEES 180,163 164,757
There are a number of members whose daily fee is paid directly to their school, centre or organisation. These Council members are being paid by their institutions and appropriately do not accept a payment for services to the Council. The Council has had Director's and officers liability and professional indemnity insurance in place during the financial year in respect of the liability or costs of the Council members and employees. Until 31 January 2010, the Council Chair received a daily meeting fee of up to $700. From 1 February 2010 the Council Chair received a daily meeting fee of up to $655. The Council members received a daily meeting fee of $385 plus a preparatory fee of $192.50.

 

NOTE 14: EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION
    2009/10 Actual $ 2008/09 Actual $
100,000 – 109,999   1 3
110,000 – 119,999   2 2
120,000 – 129,999   1 -
130,000 – 139,999   1 -
160,000 – 169,999   - 1
170,000 – 179,999   1 -
The Directors total remuneration falls in the 170,000 – 179,999 band. During the year ended 30 June 2010, 1 employee received compensation and other benefits in relation to cessation totalling $39,870 (2009: $4,776).

 

NOTE 15: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
There are no significant events subsequent to balance date.

 

NOTE 16: EXPLANATION OF FINANCIAL VARIANCES FROM BUDGET
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
  • Revenue
Total income is over budget by $521,050.
  • Fees $250,807
Projected fee income is based on the practising certificate expiry date. The Council saw an increase in renewals by 28.66% against budget or the equivalent of 4,700 applications, with a significant proportion of the increase occuring in the final six week period prior to the end of the financial year. This marked increase was due to the announcement of an increase to the triennial practising certificate fee. The Council experienced lower than expected new registration applications of (1.93%) against budget or the equivalent of 260 applications.
  • Late Fee $93,939
This new revenue stream has exceeded the Council's expectations and highlights the need to penalise those applying without a current practising certificate or LAT authorisation while they have continued to be employed in a teaching position.
  • Expenditure
Total expenditure is under budget by ($416,398).
  • Other operating expenses ($152,658)
The expenditure associated with the investigation and hearings in the complaints/discipline area was below the Council's expectations by $100,778 for the year. The costs of the hearings were managed as efficiently as possible.
  • Special Projects ($207,668)
The expenditure was lower than expected due to the costs of some projects being deferred to 2010/11 and later financial years.

 

NOTE 17: RELATED PARTIES  
Identity of related parties The Council is an autonomous Crown Entity and receives an annual grant from the Ministry of Education of $178,000 (2009: $178,000) and all conditions of the grant have been met in the financial year. The Council enters into transactions with government departments, State-Owned Enterprises and other Crown Entities. Those transactions occur on an arm's length basis.

 

 

 

Audit Logo

 

Audit Report

Return to contents

To the readers of the New Zealand Teachers Council’s financial statements and Statement of service Performance

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010

 

The Auditor-General is the auditor of the New Zealand Teachers Council (the Council). The Auditor-General has appointed me, Phil Kennerley, using the staff and resources of Audit New Zealand, to carry out the audit on her behalf. The audit covers the financial statements and statement of service performance included in the annual report of the Council for the year ended 30 June 2010.

 

UNQUALIFIED OPINION

 

In our opinion:
  • The financial statements of the Council on pages 13 to 16:
  • comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and
  • fairly reflect:
  • the Council’s financial position as at 30 June 2010; and
  • the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended on that date.
  • The statement of service performance of the Council on pages 7 to 11:
  • complies with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and
  • fairly reflects for each class of outputs:
  • its standards of delivery performance achieved, as compared with the forecast standards outlined in the statement of forecast service performance adopted at the start of the financial year; and
  • its actual revenue earned and output expenses incurred, as compared with the forecast revenues and output expenses outlined in the statement of forecast service performance adopted at the start of the financial year.

 

The audit was completed on 15 October 2010, and is the date at which our opinion is expressed.

The basis of our opinion is explained below. In addition, we outline the responsibilities of the Council and the Auditor, and explain our independence.

 

BASIS OF OPINION

 

We carried out the audit in accordance with the Auditor-General's Auditing Standards, which incorporate the New Zealand Auditing Standards.

 

We planned and performed the audit to obtain all the information and explanations we considered necessary in order to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements and statement of service performance did not have material misstatements, whether caused by fraud or error.

 

Material misstatements are differences or omissions of amounts and disclosures that would affect a reader’s overall understanding of the financial statements and statement of service performance. If we had found material misstatements that were not corrected, we would have referred to them in our opinion.

 

The audit involved performing procedures to test the information presented in the financial statements and statement of service performance. We assessed the results of those procedures in forming our opinion.

 

Audit procedures generally include:

 

  • determining whether significant financial and management controls are working and can be relied on to produce complete and accurate data;
  • verifying samples of transactions and account balances;
  • performing analyses to identify anomalies in the reported data;
  • reviewing significant estimates and judgements made by the Council;
  • confirming year-end balances;
  • determining whether accounting policies are appropriate and consistently applied; and
  • determining whether all financial statement and statement of service performance disclosures are adequate.

 

We did not examine every transaction, nor do we guarantee complete accuracy of the financial statements and statement of service performance.

 

We evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements and statement of service performance. We obtained all the information and explanations we required to support our opinion above.

 

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COUNCIL AND THE AUDITOR

 

The Council is responsible for preparing the financial statements and statement of service performance in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand. The financial statements must fairly reflect the financial position of the Council as at 30 June 2010 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended on that date. The statement of service performance must fairly reflect, for each class of outputs, the Council’s standards of delivery performance achieved and revenue earned and expenses incurred, as compared with the forecast standards, revenue and expenses adopted at the start of the financial year. The Council’s responsibilities arise from the Crown Entities Act 2004.

We are responsible for expressing an independent opinion on the financial statements and statement of service performance and reporting that opinion to you. This responsibility arises from section 15 of the Public Audit Act 2001 and the Crown Entities Act 2004.

 

INDEPENDENCE

 

When carrying out the audit we followed the independence requirements of the Auditor-General, which incorporate the independence requirements of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.

 

Other than the audit, we have no relationship with or interests in the Council.

 

 

 

 

Phil Kennerley

Audit New Zealand

On behalf of the Auditor-General

Wellington, New Zealand

 

Matters relating to the electronic presentation of the audited financial statements and statement of service performance

This audit report relates to the financial statements and statement of service performance of New Zealand Teachers Council (NZTC) for the year ended 30 June 2010 included on NZTC's website. The Council is responsible for the maintenance and integrity of NZTC's website. We have not been engaged to report on the integrity of NZTC's website. We accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements and statement of service performance since they were initially presented on the website. 

The audit report refers only to the financial statements and statement of performance named above. It does not provide an opinion on any other information which may have been hyperlinked to or from the financial statements and statement of service performance. If readers of this report are concerned with the inherent risks arising from electronic data communication they should refer to the published hard copy of the audited financial statements and statement of service performance as well as the related audit report dated 15 October 2010 to confirm the information included in the audited financial statements and statement of service performance presented on this website.

Legislation in New Zealand governing the preparation and dissemination of financial information may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

 

 

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Return to contents

 

DISCLOSURE OF FEES 2009/10

Return to contents

 

Until 31 January 2010 the Council Chair received a daily meeting fee of up to $700. From 1 February 2010 the Council Chair received a daily meeting fee of up to $655. Council members receive a daily meeting fee of $385 plus a preparatory fee of $192.50.

Additional payment is made for preparation time, including for those on the DT or one of the panels of the CAC.

Remuneration through fees to the Council members is all inclusive and no other consultancy of ex gratia payments or benefits are provided.

There are a number of members whose daily fee is paid directly to their school, centre or organisation. These Council members are being paid by their institutions and appropriately do not accept a payment for services to the Council.

 

DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL

The DT Chair receives a daily meeting fee of $900. Members receive a daily meeting fee of $415.

Kenneth Johnstone: Chair $22,978  
Barbara Arnott $815  
Graeme Gilbert $1,660  
Judith Catton $1,868  
Lorraine Skiffington -  
Megan Cassidy $2,023  
Patrick Walsh $3,416  
Tessa M Hunia $830  
Vivianne Murphy $1,205  

 

COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE

The CAC Convenor and Chairs receive a daily meeting fee of $475. Members receive a daily meeting fee of $385.

Lyn Brash: Convenor $12,542  
Graeme Oldershaw: Chair $10,925  
Jain Gaudin: Chair $13,165  
Alison Stockwell $6,610  
Denis Cocks $5,967  
Irene Symes $2,950  
Jane Culhane $6,609  
Jenny Varney $9,090  
Jill Page $797  
Keith Lees $10,395  
Margaret Smith $578  
Pat Newman $5,240  
Sandy Radford $8,470  
Stephanie Norrie $4,962  
William Noble $9,795  

 

EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ADVISORY GROUP
Helen May: Convenor $870  
Amanda Coulson -  
Arapera Royal Tanaera -  
Barbara Backshall $449  
Eneleata Tapusoa $215  
Hinerangi Korewha $191  
Jacqui Heywood -  
Margaret Barclay $382  
Valarie Kay Lloyd-Jones $968  

 

MĀORI MEDIUM ADVISORY GROUP

 

Tony Trinick: Convenor

 

$1,305

 

 

 

Arthur Savage

 

$621

 

 

 

Hineihaea Murphy

 

$1,290

 

 

 

Liz Patara

 

$285

 

 

 

Patricia Haromi Williams

 

$1,218

 

 

 

Piripi Blake

 

-

 

 

 

Robyn Hata

 

$435

 

 

 

Winnie Emery

 

$538

 

 

 

 

DIRECTORY

Return to contents

 

 

New Zealand Teachers Council

Te Pouherenga Kaiako o Aotearoa

PO Box 5326

Level 7

93 The Terrace

Wellington

 

Telephone: (04) 471 0852

Facsimile: (04) 471 0870

Email: inquiries@teacherscouncil.govt.nz

Website: www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz

 

Legal Counsel

Harbour Chambers

Level 10

Equinox House

111 The Terrace

Wellington

 

Auditor

Audit New Zealand

Level 8

St Paul's Square

45 Pipitea Street

Wellington

 

Accountants

Grant Thornton

Level 13

AXA Building

80 The Terrace

Wellington

 

Insurers

Marsh Insurance Limited

PO Box 699

Wellington

 

Bankers

Bank of New Zealand

North End Branch

100 Lambton Quay

Wellington